Our Constitution Is Under Attack

[Tsing Tao]

Quote from iceman1:

pspr has to be a crack head!

It's OK for scum like him to disregard the constitutional edict against separation of church and state but blow smoke out his arse when the 2nd amendment supposedly, allegedly is "under attack" by seeeking to banning some weapons! Nothing in the Constitution is absolute or subject to only ONE interpretation.

I am an attorney and former prosecutor. I know the Constitution, for real. [what the f-ck am I dong on a website with so many amateur, charlatan legal scholars? - LOL]

Arse-holes like pspr and others from the right-wing hypocritical ilk - DO NOT!

LOL

LOL! What a load of shit.

 

[PHOENIX TRADING]

Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:

1)I remember watching that on video and my recollection is it was said far before the obamacare issue. I believe it was at a townhall in which all the BS unconstitutional bailout and stimulus plans were questioned.

I also distinctly remember democrats cancelling all townhall formats where the audience was NOT PRESCREENED AND SELECTED. This was before the 2010 midterm rout.

1)I may be wrong about what the question was that brought that response, it may have indeed been about obamacare.
But I'm pretty sure of the q&a format that developed it, pre 2010 midterm elections townhall meeting in SC.

 

[pspr]

Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:

1)I may be wrong about what the question was that brought that response, it may have indeed been about obamacare.
But I'm pretty sure of the q&a format that developed it, pre 2010 midterm elections townhall meeting in SC.

I remember a video with a comment like that by some Congressman at a town hall, too. I don't remember if it was in the early days of the ObamaCare debate or before that. It's like they consider the Constitution irrelevant.

 

[marcoPolo21]

Oh give me the guns, lots of guns
Under starry skies above
Don't fence me in
Let me ride through the wide open
Contry that I love
Don't fence me in
Let me be by myself in the evening brezze
Listen to the murmur of the cottenwood trees
Send me off foever but I ask you please
Don't fence me in

Just turn me loose let me straddle my old sattle
Underneath the westren skies
On my kioose let me wander over younder
Till I see the mountian rise
I want to ride to the ridge where the west commenses
Gaze at the moon till I lose my senenses
I can't look at the hobbels and I can't stand the fences
Don't fence me in

i recommend sleeping with the dear guns,
[& having sex with them]
just like they did in the 1860s

marc

 

[wjk]

Quote from iceman1:

I am an attorney and former prosecutor. I know the Constitution, for real.

Perhaps you know of Mark Levin, a constitutional scholar. Being educated in the constitution yourself, what is your opinion of his books "Liberty and Tyranny" and "Ameritopia"? You have read them, haven't you?


Call his show and ID yourself as Iceman. I would love to hear you debate him about your views of the constitution vs his.

You can start here.
http://www.marklevinshow.com/home.asp

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from wjk:

Perhaps you know of Mark Levin, a constitutional scholar. Being educated in the constitution yourself, what is your opinion of his books "Liberty and Tyranny" and "Ameritopia"? You have read them, haven't you?


Call his show and ID yourself as Iceman. I would love to hear you debate him about your views of the constitution vs his.

You can start here.
http://www.marklevinshow.com/home.asp

icehole vs Mark Levin, that'd be a short debate.

 

[piezoe]

Quote from pspr:

For much of its 236-year history, the federal government has accumulated new power by whittling away at the essential protections afforded to American citizens under the U.S. Constitution.

In recent years this wholesale abandonment of our founding principles has rapidly gained momentum — accompanied by a skyrocketing government debt that now eclipses our nation's annual gross domestic product.

"There's a clear cause and effect here that is as neat and predictable as a law of physics," President Reagan said in his farewell address to the nation in 1989. "As government expands, liberty contracts."

No truer words have ever been spoken — yet in the last half-decade this nation has witnessed a stunning (and astronomically expensive) escalation of neo-fascism in America.

And no political party, court nor ideological movement has proved able to blunt its building momentum.

During the debate over ObamaCare — a massive, budget-busting entitlement funded with money our country doesn't have — former New Jersey Judge Andrew Napolitano pointedly challenged then-U.S. Majority Whip Jim Clyburn, D-S.C., regarding the constitutionality of this socialized medicine monstrosity.

Clyburn's response?

"There's nothing in the Constitution that says the federal government has anything to do with most of the stuff we do," he said.

Therein lies the root of our problem.

The overt contempt for our Constitution displayed by Clyburn and other elected officials is precisely why government has become so unruly, so fiscally unsustainable and so dangerous.

Tragically for our Republic, the U.S. Supreme Court empowered this view in its ObamaCare ruling — inventing a new taxing authority to accommodate this abomination rather than following the law and protecting our liberties.

Decades of legislative overreach, executive power grabs and judicial activism have steadily diminished our freedom and free markets — a disintegration that may have already reached the point of terminal velocity.

Our national government now prints unlimited piles of money with no congressional oversight.

It taps our phones and emails with no probable cause. It compels us to purchase products or face stiff fines. And now it wants to strip us of our right to keep and bear arms.

Yet even these egregious incursions are not enough for some members of the professional left.

In a recent column published by the New York Times, Georgetown University law professor Louis Michael Seidman argues for the wholesale abandonment of the U.S. Constitution, decrying "all its archaic, idiosyncratic and downright evil provisions."

"We have to give up on the claim that we are a self-governing people who can settle our disagreements through mature and tolerant debate," Seidman writes. "We ought to try extricating ourselves from constitutional bondage so that we can give real freedom a chance."

"Real freedom"? From "constitutional bondage"?

These assertions are demonstrably illogical.

Arguing one's freedom would improve by allowing government to tighten its grip is like arguing one's breathing would improve by allowing an anaconda to do the same.

Yet we are supposed to accept the ongoing suffocation of our freedom and free markets in the name of expediting a socialist agenda that is bankrupting our country?

And give up more of our money — and our guns — to the new overlords?

Like so many ivory-tower leftists whose anti-American views hold sway in Washington, Seidman sees the Constitution as something to be shaken off — like a bad cold.

Of course, what he fails to recognize is that his prescription for constitutional emasculation would kill the very source of the federal government's power and legitimacy.

Absent the Constitution, there is no government — only anarchy.

One cannot destroy our founding document without destroying the nation it created (or what's left of it).

And make no mistake — once freed from any real or implied constraint, government becomes the tyranny our Founding Fathers (and most present-day Americans) fear.

In other words, it ceases to be America.

http://news.investors.com/ibd-edito...dom-depends-on-strong-constitution.htm?p=full

Possibly you'd be interested in this: www.BORDC.org

 

[AK Forty Seven]

Quote from iceman1:

pspr has to be a crack head!

It's OK for scum like him to disregard the constitutional edict against separation of church and state but blow smoke out his arse when the 2nd amendment supposedly, allegedly is "under attack" by seeeking to banning some weapons! Nothing in the Constitution is absolute or subject to only ONE interpretation.

I am an attorney and former prosecutor. I know the Constitution, for real. [what the f-ck am I dong on a website with so many amateur, charlatan legal scholars? - LOL]

Arse-holes like pspr and others from the right-wing hypocritical ilk - DO NOT!

LOL

He's definitely not the sharpest tool in the tool shed

Quote from pspr:

In saying "run out of office"I mean that he (Obama) won't be able to get on the ballot for a second term.

Quote from pspr:

I suspect the same thing will happen when a party doesn't show up to any civil case. The other party wins and Obama will not be on the Georgia ballot in November.

Quote from pspr:

I just see catastrophe if he (Obama)is re-elected and I don't think God will allow nationwide catastrophe to happen to the U.S. So, I have always had faith that he will not be in office in 2013.

Quote from pspr:



If you can remember your history, the election after Speaker Gingrich shut down the government saw the election of President George Bush

Clinton won the election after the shutdown

Quote from pspr:

Liberals everywhere are acclimating themselves to the fact that Obama is toast and Romney is going to be the next President.

Quote from pspr:

Hopefully, President Romney and Republicans in the House and Senate will have replaced the law with something realistic by then or soon after.

Quote from pspr:

We should start a poll on how IQ-47 is going to end it when Romney wins.

Quote from pspr:
I think AK may be right.
When Obama doesn't even get 200 electoral votes it's going to look like unskewedpolls.com was wrong saying he will get 217.

Quote from pspr:

My personal feeling is that they will NOT uphold the insurance mandate in ObamaCare

Quote from pspr:



Regardless, it will be interesting to see if the judge decides to keep Obama off the ballot. I don't see how he can rule any other way.

Quote from pspr:



I'm still waiting for Obama's October surprise but the pollsters may be doing the democrat oversampling on purpose so his supporters don't see how bad he's really doing and don't pressure him to make something happen.

Quote from pspr:

The race hasn't even started yet. As mentioned in the analysis, "these polls will change". Other polls show just the opposite so it's better for people, at this stage, to be concerned you are behind than to get too confident in April.

Besides, we have all these and other shockers to come:

The Holder Contempt Trial
The Occupy Riots
The Black Riots
The Obama Historical Movie
More BC Revelations
The Summer Economic Slump
Possible Stubbornly High Gas Prices
Possible Stumbles in The Debates (Obama doesn't do good without a teleprompter)
Possible Inflation taking hold
October Surprises

Quote from pspr:

This is just sad.

I'm hoping "Fast And Furious" will turn out to be Obama's "Watergate". If we can get him out of the White House Biden will be inept and won't do more damage. Obama has more damage planned for the economy if he stays for another 18 months.

Quote from pspr:

I think they (Arabs, Palestinians and Obama) are trying to box Israel into a corner. Of course the Arabs would just love for Israel to defend itself and have the U.S. on the other side. This could be Obama's Watergate (or Waterloo).

Quote from pspr:

At least until we get to the October Marshall Law event. I've noticed even the Weather Service and the Social Security Administration are ordering tens of thousands of hollow point pistol rounds and the military has written a manual on dealing with civil disobedience.

Quote from pspr:



Then there is the October surprise. Israel attack on Iran, Obama military action somewhere, Obama push at civil disobedience, polling intimidation, etc. I don't know what, but if Obama is behind Romney in Ocotober he is going to do something shocking.

Quote from pspr:



I'm still waiting to see what the Obama manufactured event/crisis is going to be that supposedly will unite the country behind him in October. A failed (staged) assassination attempt would probably do it.

Quote from pspr:

Could this be how Obama tries to rally the country behind him before election day?

Possibility 1)
Picture the next and final debate on foreign policy. Midway through the debate a uniformed Army Officer walks out on the stage and whispers something in the President's ear. Moments later Obama announces to the nation that he is going to suspend the rest of the debate and make an announcement to the American people. Romney is ushered out of the room by the Secret Service.

The podium is transformed in seconds with the Shield of The President and teleprompter screens positioned on each side.

Obama proceeds to make a 60 minute pre-planned announcement that the attackers of the Libyan Consulate have been brought to justice and taken out by U.S. armed drones. He then precedes to outline in detail how his conflicting statements on Libya were designed to keep the terrorists off balance while they were being identified and located so they could be eliminated.
-----
Possibility 2)
During the debate a shot rings out and the President clutches his shoulder and falls to the ground. The perp (put up to the deed by the Obama Campaign) has fired a blank round but a device under the president's jacket has imparted a shallow wound to his shoulder.

The perp is hauled off to an undisclosed location and after treatment Obama says he will continue the debate with his right arm now in a sling and bandages apparent under his jacket.
-----
Either of these possibilities could throw a big monkey wrench into this election.

 

[John_Wensink]

So you must be angry obama care forces religious institutions to ensure sandra fluke has birth control correct?

Quote from iceman1:

pspr has to be a crack head!

It's OK for scum like him to disregard the constitutional edict against separation of church and state but blow smoke out his arse when the 2nd amendment supposedly, allegedly is "under attack" by seeeking to banning some weapons! Nothing in the Constitution is absolute or subject to only ONE interpretation.

I am an attorney and former prosecutor. I know the Constitution, for real. [what the f-ck am I dong on a website with so many amateur, charlatan legal scholars? - LOL]

Arse-holes like pspr and others from the right-wing hypocritical ilk - DO NOT!

LOL