I think regulators are likely to look at this problem a bit differently.
It is quite obvious that many of these firms are eggregiously overvalued, and that anybody shorting them is performing a public good.
So what is the problem, the naked shorts or the less-than-ideal rules??
If Byrne really wants to be done with it he should simply take it private - dealing with regulators is likely nothing but a big pain in the ass and a waste of time.
Think about it - what regulator wants to cause all these dogs-with-fleas to spike through the roof when they finally start enforcing a rule they've ignored for so long? Just doesn't seem likely ...
It is quite obvious that many of these firms are eggregiously overvalued, and that anybody shorting them is performing a public good.
So what is the problem, the naked shorts or the less-than-ideal rules??
If Byrne really wants to be done with it he should simply take it private - dealing with regulators is likely nothing but a big pain in the ass and a waste of time.
Think about it - what regulator wants to cause all these dogs-with-fleas to spike through the roof when they finally start enforcing a rule they've ignored for so long? Just doesn't seem likely ...