Quote from SWScapital:
Is this a fact? Has it been proven there are naked sellers in this name? If so why hasn't the NASD/SEC halted trading in OSTK to investigate? I am being serious here....if not all of this is pure speculation. And it would not surprise me one bit if the CEO was cheerleading and simply trying to maintain unwarranted levels in the common.
Yes, it's fact, yes it can be proven, and yes it's all here:
http://www.shareholder.com/overstock/downloads/TranscriptLawsuit.pdf
"If so why hasn't the NASD/SEC halted trading in OSTK to investigate?" That's the exact question Byrne and the rest of us are asking. He's saying look, it's here, I can prove it, and I'm gonna take these bastards to court to prove it. If you look on Yahoo you can see that there is 18.6 million shares outstanding, and 6.5 million short. Byrne can account for something like 11 million of those shares by either owning them himself, his dad owning them, or some of his large institutional friends. You can't tell me out of the 7 million remaining, only half a million are long?
Honestly, read that article with an open mind and see for yourself. I'm not trying to convince you of anything, just relaying what I believe the facts say to me.
-The New Guy