Noticed this today: Once upon a time I sat on an editorial desk, and these two Bloomberg stories struck me as exactly how an editor/news team would gear up to follow a Milken/naked shorting story. Note the two stories listed immediately one after another on the BB website this weekend:
The first is a very broad backgrounder on naked shorting. Nothing really new here - just looks like an opportunistic exercise to have one or more reporters get up to speed on the issue.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=a387ALHm8OlU&refer=home
That story was immediately follow by an interview with Milken that is oddly appropos to absolutely nothing. Typically reporters will use these kind of fluff interviews as a vehicle for getting close to a source that could prove valuable on different stories at a later date.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aet7nPFPv79s&refer=home
My gut tells me Bloomberg news is positioning ahead of a possible story. Whether they see something that isn't already out is another question ...
The first is a very broad backgrounder on naked shorting. Nothing really new here - just looks like an opportunistic exercise to have one or more reporters get up to speed on the issue.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=a387ALHm8OlU&refer=home
That story was immediately follow by an interview with Milken that is oddly appropos to absolutely nothing. Typically reporters will use these kind of fluff interviews as a vehicle for getting close to a source that could prove valuable on different stories at a later date.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aet7nPFPv79s&refer=home
My gut tells me Bloomberg news is positioning ahead of a possible story. Whether they see something that isn't already out is another question ...