OSTK ceo

Quote from flytiger:

UAL, DAL, Winn DIxid,

That's the best you can come up with? All three are losers. Show me a profitable company that ever went out of business because people were pressuring the stock.
 
Quote from flytiger:

UAL, DAL, Winn DIxid, some of the bigger names. The dark side drives the prices down so the ability of the company to fund itself is taken away. They pick on weak companies. I believe they picked on OSTK because of the dutch auction and Patrick's reputation of being, shall we say, off the beaten path. The quicker the stock goes down, the more profits with greater liquidity.. Goes to zero, no taxes. Brokers do not report deregistered situations to the IRS. Don' worry, we told them. Expect to see that very soon. That's jail time, gotta love it.

..............


maybe they are also doing a little statistical arbitrage.... take down ostk while they pump up ebay... who knows.
 
Quote from flytiger:


I know Patrick Bryne.... He could be sippin' Champagne, waiting for you bastards to take the stock to 2, where he'd tender for the four real shares that are left.

Nope, you are right. He'd rather buy 200k shares @$40 and watch it go to 4. Reminds me of the Guinness beer commercials where one of the guys comes up with a dumbass idea, and the other guy shouts "Brillant"!

You know of no finer person? Then you need to get out more.
 
Quote from flytiger:



BlueHorseShit. I know Patrick Bryne. You aren't fit to wipe his ass. He could be sippin' Champagne, waiting for you bastards to take the stock to 2, where he'd tender for the four real shares that are left. Instead, he wades in and lets everybody take pot shots at him. It's called "integrity". Wall St. should have a little bit of that elixar.


are you paid in any way by byrne or his company or by anyone connected to him to put up this smokescreen all over the internet? i have noticed you are on many boards spreading the same stuff everywhere.
 
Quote from flytiger:

The dark side drives the prices down so the ability of the company to fund itself is taken away.

Here's a novel concept. Trying funding it with profits. There's nothing wrong with a company that profits can't cure.
 
for the last time:

NOBODY, ANYWHERE, NOHOW, HAS THE RIGHT TO BREAK THE LAW AND ARTIFICIALLY DEPRESS THE PRICE BECAUSE IN THEIR MIND, IT IS A PIECE OF SHIT COMPANY. HOW STUPID ARE YOU?

You are right in one point. If it's no good, the market will take care of it, but we don't need bd's lending out 10 to 15 times the amount of legally hypothecated stock to help get it there because there is a 30% negative rebate.

Hey, einstein. How old is Grandma? Ain't she lived long enough? Go put a pillow over her head for, say, two minutes. She's lived a long time, and she's going to die anyway.

Morons. Ethically challanged morons.
 
How come nobody asks about the compensation of the dark side. Aren't you interested in the reason why Rocker is legally short, but OSTK is on the SHO list over 200 days? Why do you always ask about little ole me.?

the answer to your question is no, I receive no compensation from anybody. I simply know the difference between right and wrong.

for your reading pleasure:

http://www.thesanitycheck.com/Blogs/DrJimDeCostasBlog/tabid/99/EntryID/80/Default.aspx

tick, tock, tick tock.

"It's an evil time in America........" 11billion bonus money my ass. Rocker's prime broker. Big coincidence there.
 
what got me was when cnbc spiked the story and one of the little minions came on right before psychopath's cramers show and went ballistic on anyone that would question rocker's integrity. i went long vomit bags at that very moment.
 
Ratboy, please private message time of that, and I'll get the video.

Here's a headline in the most recent "PIPES REPORT". I can't post the story, because it's 1500 a year, and Brett doesn't want it out there for free.

DID PIPE SHORT SALE LIABILITIES BRING DOWN REFCO

Yes, they did, in my opinion. For arguments sake, what do you think all the guys on this board who lost cumulative billions in that mess say to this? Is it just about "shitty companies" now? When you have a scandal of these proportions, the victims are not just the shareholders. Ask Jim Rogers what he thinks of Naked Short selling now, or Kiting, as DeCosta says in the previous piece.

For those of you that argue for driving little companies out of business and you aren't participating in the billions of illicit profits, how dumb are you? If that money stayed in the markets instead of being ciphoned off be the brokers, where would the markets be? My guess would be higher. But then, I'm on the take, and I don't need the money anyway. Sheesh.

My goal is, and it's working, is to get the little guy to understand how badly he's been taken, and for him to force the issue. In the end, it's all about the politicians anyway. Watch the press early next week, and you'll see what I mean. Aw, hell. Back the Chevy up to the house, vent the exhaust into your abode, and take a nap. I'll post it here because I enjoy tormenting you fucks.

Get this straight.. The rest of us cannot have a fair, tradeable market when Wall St can, and will, counterfeit book entry securities. They have more fake paper than you have real cash. If you can't understand that, or my motive, then you're the one taking the vig.
 
Quote from sprstpd:

With all of your posts, you seem to ignore the fact of how badly OSTK sucks in terms of making money as a company. If you would look at that fact, then you would see that all of your posts don't really matter. Contrary to what you say, I believe that if OSTK wasn't a piece of crap company, that people would be putting it to the shorts right now. The market has the ability to take care of itself.

Bingo! Give the man a cigar!

I've said it before too, but somehow he just evades and gets angry. That is the crux of the issue...all else is jibber-jabber.
 
Back
Top