Oscillators

I always ask myself, why does he talk so much?
If his trading methods are so great just stfu and trade for a living!
phenomenally, we have the same thoughts, I also wonder what makes people look at my branch, they are told in Russian, there will be no more forecasts, I won’t tell my secrets and they’re all climbing and climbing
 
The most important moron assured me that people want to look at my rudeness, but there are special sites for this and they may like it more than here
 
At least you're being honest now.

Two questions:
* Reports from 2015?! What have you done in the meantime?
* I spot some serious drawdowns; it looks like you need a large stoploss.
What is your risk/reward?
for example, this idiot, he sees that my profit for 2 weeks amounted to more than 3000%, what do I care about risk? I wanted to spit on any of your calculations, I know where the price will go and just make money.


Dozens of tools work simultaneously, and if I made a mistake somewhere, I just closed the deal and did not even notice these losses
 
Last edited:
If I listened to all your American experts on the rules of trading on the exchange with their opinions and considerations, and would not have thought with my head, I would have been both a poor and an idiot
 
you morons are not able to understand even the elementary, the forum is needed in order to

Bernard Show

If you have an apple, and I have an apple, and we exchange these apples, then each of us will have one apple ... If you have an idea, and I have an idea, and we will exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas!
 
you morons are not able to understand even the elementary, the forum is needed in order to

Bernard Show

If you have an apple, and I have an apple, and we exchange these apples, then each of us will have one apple ... If you have an idea, and I have an idea, and we will exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas!


The logic of the metaphor fits better when one has ‘two’ apples and the counterparty has ‘two’ of something one wants.

In the exchange, both parties have a greater more diverse whole.

So far you’ve done a stellar job of ‘not’ building on any of the principals of the methodology and generously denigrating others while being self-aggrandizing.

They are many here that would engage with you intellectually but your behavior as described keeps them at bay.

This troll thread is more revealing of your own prejudice and bias than revealing anything about those whom read the next broadly cast criticism posted by you or of you quoting yourself.
 
The logic of the metaphor fits better when one has ‘two’ apples and the counterparty has ‘two’ of something one wants.

In the exchange, both parties have a greater more diverse whole.

So far you’ve done a stellar job of ‘not’ building on any of the principals of the methodology and generously denigrating others while being self-aggrandizing.

They are many here that would engage with you intellectually but your behavior as described keeps them at bay.

This troll thread is more revealing of your own prejudice and bias than revealing anything about those whom read the next broadly cast criticism posted by you or of you quoting yourself.
Before putting on a villain's mask, I always politely knock on the door and carefully start a dialogue.

So it was in my first, second and third blogs

You first started throwing stones at me, naturally you got an answer
It was not difficult for me to prove to you that you not only do not understand the topic that I spoke about, but even in logical thinking you are complete idiots
You do not like it, but it is a fact

Conclusion - you don’t need to be rude to a stranger, and you will not get a rude answer
 
Back
Top