The court papers :
Court ruling
Basically the case stems from a someone who has her education and training paid for by the taxpayer but refuses to fulfill her military obligation.
From court (copy and paste was a little rough):
To press her âbirther agenda,â Plaintiffâs counsel has filed the
present action on behalf of Captain Rhodes. Captain Rhodes entered the Army in March of 2005 and presently serves as a medical doctor. The American taxpayers paid for her third and fourth years of medical school and financially supported her during her subsequent medical internship and residency program. In exchange for this valuable free medical education, Captain Rhodes agreed to serve two years in active
service in the Army. She began that term of active service in July
of 2008 and had no concerns about fulfilling her military obligation
until she received orders notifying her that she would be deployed to Iraq in September of 2009.
First, Plaintiffâs challenge to her deployment
order is frivolous. She has presented no credible evidence and has made no reliable factual allegations to support her unsubstantiated, conclusory allegations and conjecture that President Obama is ineligible to serve as President of the United States. Instead, she uses her Complaint as a platform for spouting political rhetoric, such as her claims that the President is âan illegal usurper, an unlawful pretender, [and] an unqualified imposter.â (Compl. ¶ 21.) She continues with bare, conclusory allegations that the President is âan alien, possibly even an unnaturalized or even an unadmitted illegal alien . . . without so much as lawful residency in the United States.â (Id. ¶ 26.) Then, implying that the President is either awandering nomad or a prolific identity fraud crook, she alleges that the President âmight have used as many as 149 addresses and 39 social security numbers prior to assuming the office of President.â (Id. ¶ 110 (emphasis added).) Acknowledging the existence of a document
that shows the President was born in Hawaii, Plaintiff alleges that
the document âcannot be verified as genuine, and should be presumed fraudulent.â (Id. ¶ 113 (emphasis added).) In further support of her claim, Plaintiff relies upon âthe general opinion in the rest of the worldâ that âBarack Hussein Obama has, in essence, slipped through the guardrails to become President.â (Id. ¶ 128.)
Moreover, as though the âgeneral opinion in the rest of the worldâ were not enough, Plaintiff alleges in her Complaint that according to an âAOL poll 85% of Americans believe that Obama was not vetted, needs to be vetted and his vital records need to be produced.â (Id. ¶ 154.) Finally, in a remarkable shifting of the traditional legal burden of proof, Plaintiff unashamedly alleges that Defendant has the burden to prove his ânatural bornâ status. (Id. ¶¶ 136-138, 148.) Thus, Plaintiffâs counsel, who champions herself as a defender of liberty and freedom, seeks to use the power of the judiciary to compel a citizen, albeit the President of the United States, to âprove his innocenceâ to âchargesâ that are based upon conjecture and
speculation. Any middle school civics student would readily
recognize the irony of abandoning fundamental principles upon which our Country was founded in order to purportedly âprotect and preserveâ those very principles.
---------
Lemme get this straight, Obama beat out his democratic field for the nomination and then the republican candidate, who in total had to have spent more than $100 million on their campaigns and not a single one of them ever questioned his birth place, yet some piker of an attorney cites an AOL poll among the other nonsense as a reason the Obama shouldn't be President.
The, "implying that the President is either awandering nomad or a prolific identity fraud crook, she alleges that the President 'might have used as many as 149 addresses and 39 social security numbers prior to assuming the office of President,'â is really indescribable . Seriously how fucking stupid do you have to be to even consider trying to float that one past the court.
