Losses that occurred with the exchange going out of business do not seem directly related to Cordier's conduct at that time and affected all individuals dealing with that exchange. As to the other complaint, the adjudicating body found that Cordier conducted himself properly in some respects, but made an error as part of closing down that client's account. You can easily find this on the internet and read for yourself. I am not greedy and was looking for relatively modest returns from what was supposed to be a very conservatively managed strategy. Ratio credit spreads, other types of vertical spreads and other risk mitigation strategies are well understood by practitioners in this space and Cordier himself advocated these techniques in his book, videos, and personal representations. A person is not gullible if such techniques are available, perform their desired function in limiting risk, are understood and practiced by industry practitioners, and are assured by their money manager that he is an expert in such practice and techniques and that client funds will be managed conservatively in accordance with conservative principles. This person deceived us and induced us to enter into a relationship with him that deviated from his stated approach. From my point of view, his actions are in breach of contract and his fiduciary responsibilities, tortious, and criminal in some regards, and I expect that a court will likely find this to be the case. In any event, I do not want to further engage in this rhetoric with you since you seem determined to slander me and the other victims.