Quote from riskfreetrading:while I agree that McMillan is dry, I could not read him, he is considered the gold standard. Him and Fontanills.
Math in MacMillan? Are you kidding me. I love math. A math book is a book in which there are only theorems and lemmas, and I love theorems and lemmas. I wish he wrote it that way.
He writes ideas in words (not math), and what he says contains no insight, just description of tools. Dry, more dry than a desert.
I also read another of his books (new insights on covered calls or
something like that). The only insight is the word in the title of the book (and should be in singualr form), and there is better than CC. CC is a "loser" in my view (You earn a little in bull markets and lose a lot in bear markets). It is wrong headed.
Tell me just one insight you got from those books of his?
He is not an expert, but just someone who wrote books. And if his book is that good, why does he write other books (that contain nothing new, worst the may deviate people from the right path? Everyone can write books.
The question is: could one write original and insightful books!