I tend to also prefer Conformal Cyclic Cosmology but only when the Fermi Paradox is used. That's a more novel perspective which could, in principle, be encoded in the cosmic microwave background. I have found however that the application of the Fermi Paradox does cause aberrations when applying Fibonacci sequences to my charts. In reality however I have found that applying Occam's razor works best. I.e. use as few assumptions as possible. That the simplest explanation is probably the best explanation. That the simpler model is probably the better model. The more assumptions and intricacies you add, the more likely your explanations are inaccurate. Go ahead, put bollinger bands, rsi, moving averages, channels, hanging chads and swinging pitchforks on your chart and see where it gets you. >.-)
P.s. I did try using Gann levels and a Sentiment Zone Oscillator once but found that whenever the Earth and the Moon came into alignment it threw everything off. I am doing well this month but I believe that it's because the New Moon is in Libra and the Sun has moved 30 degrees, Mercury moved from Virgo to Scorpio, Venus moved from Scorpio, where it is bad, or weak, to Sagittarius, where it is neutral, and by the next weeks Weekly /ES expiration date Mars will still be in Capricorn and out of Bound, where it is exalted, extremely strong, and the rest don't move much. Uranus and Neptune will still be retrograde, it is enough to absorb Pluto's Direct motion. And cause all my OTM credit spreads to expire OTM. Awesome...
