Quote from Maverick74:
OK, I didn't hear him say any of that. He just mumbled something about earning income in the meantime which all option trades should seek income as in a profit. I'm trying to get him to take advantage of the situation the market is giving him. He got a pullback in the stock, do something with it. There is NO way to get money back. Options trading does not work like that. I can't get back my losses from any of my old trades either. He has to look forward with "new" trades. He sounds like a long term investor so I have no idea why he would be "upset" about making money if the stock goes back up. He can make the ratio spread as wide as he wants. I have no idea what his cost basis is. He can manipulate the strikes anyway he wants. Of course, he can always do nothing. But there is no way to "repair" this situation and I get highly annoyed when guys think they can go back in a time machine and fix trades that already happened. The ratio spread is the optimal spread for the hand he has been dealt at the moment going "forward". Just my opinion of course.
I got the sense he's hoping to make "free premium" to lower his breakeven point. But he wasn't clear. So I got the sense he wanted out when the stock got to some level.
Anyway, I like those structures. I used to trade them a lot from 2003 to 2010. I should say, "invest" in them as they would all be 1 year+ trades. I made a lot of money in my long only account. Most of the time I got the market return or better on 1/2 the investment. And then in 2008, that "1/2 the investment" really paid off. However, since then these structures haven't been as interesting.
Private banks would offer them with buffers on the downside (10% protection) and then accelerated downside 1.1% to 1% decline in the market.
edit: to your edit, I guess the structure doesn't qualify as income generating. But this is all semantics. It's a good structure, but he should know that if the stock recovers he won't until expiry.