Oprah for President?

I see. So maybe you should take one of Wyoming's senators away from them because California actually had more dems vote for senator.

Nice theory there to add to your electoral college/popular vote theories and rants.

heh. you guys need a drug test. you are getting confuseder and confuseder and turning into mush. best thing that could happen would be for the dem lefties to split off with Bernie and form a progressive party so that at least the people in the dnc dud party and loon lefty party would know what they stand for. sure, you will get clobbered if you split but you are headed that way anyway.

Of course Wyoming's 600,000 people should have the same representation as California's 40 million.
 
Of course Wyoming's 600,000 people should have the same representation as California's 40 million.



In the senate yes, and as otherwise defined in the constitution for other offices.

Probably you can find a copy of the constitution on google.
 
In 2008 yes.If Obama had gotten the same Black voter turn out in 2012 that Hillary got in 2016 Romney would have won.
Wasn't any republican going to win in 2008, the economy was destroyed. Both parties contributed to the collapse, but the repubs took most of the blame. Why do you think the left gave Hillary the boot and went with Obama? It was a lay up and even a black guy with zero experience could win. Race always trumps gender with the left. 2012 was kind of a mystery to me. Romney should have won, but people are stupid and gullible, so they believed the lies and bullshit in just enough numbers for Obama to win. Black votes are meaningless. They just don't have the numbers at this point in time to make any real difference. It is interesting that black unemployment is currently at it's lowest rate ever since they started recording it. We'll see if that translates to republican votes this fall, or if they're just too stupid to see where the help is coming from.
 
It is interesting that black unemployment is currently at it's lowest rate ever since they started recording it. We'll see if that translates to republican votes this fall, or if they're just too stupid to see where the help is coming from.

They where its coming from and they know its not from trump

image.png
 
I'll tell you dopes the black vote is is very important as evidenced by the 2 Obama wins,Doug Jones,Ralph Northam ect.

The Black vote is not meaningless as long as they go out and vote.Trump won because they stayed home,which wont be the case in 2020.


http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/332970-voter-turnout-dipped-in-2016-led-by-decline-among-blacks


Voter turnout dipped in 2016, led by decline among blacks

By Reid Wilson - 05/11/17


The percentage of eligible Americans who showed up to the polls in November dipped slightly to the lowest rate in sixteen years, led by a sharp drop-off in the number of black voters casting ballots.

New data released Wednesday by the Census Bureau shows an estimated 61.4 percent of Americans over the age of 18 cast ballots, down from the 61.8 percent who voted in 2012 and well below the 63.8 percent who voted in 2004, the recent high-point of voter participation.

White voters were most likely to turn out; 65.3 percent of whites told Census Bureau surveyors they voted in 2016, more than a full percentage point higher than their participation rate in 2012.

But voter turnout among black voters fell almost seven percentage points, to 59.4 percent, the Census figures show — after hitting an all-time high of 66.2 percent in 2012.

Fewer than half of Asian Americans and Hispanic Americans turned out to vote; 49 percent of Asians and 47.6 percent of those of Hispanic origin showed up to the polls last year.

Demographers point to declining black turnout and relatively low Hispanic turnout — two voting blocs on whom Democrats are increasingly reliant — as two of a handful of reasons Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton fell short in a handful of key battleground states last year.

Black turnout fell 2 points and Hispanic turnout tumbled by a whopping 34 points in Michigan, a state President Trump won by just over 10,000 votes after Clinton fell short of matching President Obama's vote totals in Detroit.

In Wisconsin, another state Trump barely won, fewer than half of black voters cast a ballot; four years ago, when Obama carried the state, 78 percent of blacks voted.

Turnout among black voters fell seven points in Florida, and turnout among Hispanic voters there, who make up critical voting blocs stretching from Miami-Dade County to Orlando, fell eight points. That ended a streak of four consecutive elections in which black and Hispanic voters showed up in increasing numbers. At the same time, white voters, who disproportionally backed Trump, turned out at a slightly higher rate in Florida than they had in 2012.

"These numbers point up a fairly pervasive decline in black turnout along with modest though uneven gains for whites," said William Frey, a demographer at the Brookings Institute. The declining turnout and Republicans' success in winning over more white voters "helped to explain shifts to Trump in several swing states."

November's contests were decided by an electorate that looked whiter than what many demographers had expected. Between 1980 and 2012, the share of the electorate made up of non-Hispanic whites dropped from 87.6 percent to 73.7 percent; in 2016, demographers expected that number to drop again, as the diverse millennial generation takes on a larger role in the body politic, replacing older generations that were less racially diverse.

But the Census Bureau data shows that 73.3 percent of the electorate in 2016 was made up of non-Hispanic whites, a statistically insignificant drop from four years before. The unexpected stasis, even as the country becomes more racially diverse, is explained by the drop in minority turnout.

That made 2016 only the second election since 1980 that the share of the electorate made up of non-Hispanic whites did not decline by a significant margin.

The decline in black participation is all the more stark after 2012, when for the first time the Census Bureau said blacks voted at a higher share than non-Hispanic whites. Still, the percentage of blacks who voted in 2016 was six points higher than the recent nadir, in 1996, when only 53 percent of blacks cast a ballot.

The data offers both hope and warning signs to Democrats plotting their political comeback, and Republicans trying to hold on to their victories.

On one hand, the data shows Democrats can chart a path back to political power by boosting turnout even at the margins among Hispanic and black voters. The party does not need to replicate Obama's 2008 and 2012 turnout machines; it simply needs to come close in large urban centers in key states like Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Florida.

On the other, it shows the demographic shift that threatens to doom Republicans — who are more reliant than ever on white voters — is manifesting itself more slowly in the electorate than in the population as a whole. That fact gives Republicans time to build new inroads to minority communities, where the party has struggled to attract support.

Younger voters grew as a share of the electorate, both as more millennials reach voting age and as they become turnout targets for both parties. Michael McDonald, a political scientist at the University of Florida, said turnout among voters between 18 and 29 years of age grew by 2.5 percentage points, the largest increase of any age group.

But older voters are still much more likely to cast a ballot: More than 70 percent of those over the age of 65 voted in November, far higher than the 43.4 percent of 18-29 year olds who voted. Two-thirds of those between the ages of 45 and 64 voted, according to Frey's analysis.

The Census Bureau's data relies on a survey the agency conducts to supplement the much larger Current Population Survey.

Other surveys have concluded that a smaller number of eligible voters actually cast ballots: One study for the group Nonprofit Vote, in which McDonald took part, found 60.2 percent of the nation's 231 million eligible voters cast a ballot in November.

That figure was higher than the percentage of eligible voters who turned out in presidential elections between 1972 and 2000, though it fell below the recent pinnacle achieved in 2008.

So blacks turned out in record numbers to elect the 1st (2nd if you count Bill C) black President. No argument there.
What do they have to show for it? Seriously. How are their lives better?
Why would they show up in record #'s again? just for race?
 
Ben destroys Oaf-rah and leftist hypocrisy on sexual mis-conduct, but also points out how Oaf-rah makes for a perfect leftist candidate and potential problems for Trump if she ran .
 
Unbelievable trump and his supporters are trying to take credit for the Black unemployment rate

image.png


Obama's unemployment numbers were propelled by people dropping out of the job market who stopped looking- and who therefore stopped being counted as unemployed. Lowest labor participation on record. And no one dropped out more and faster than blacks. But hey, which is more important, having a black president who helps blacks-especially black youth- get jobs or having a black president who looks groovy when he is dancing with Ellen Degenerate? I think we know what matters most to demtards.

Wayyy to go Barry.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jem
Back
Top