Opps! He Didn't Even Listen To Talk Radio

[Mercor]

Sometimes simple coincidences seem to have patterns when there are none.

Certainly if a tragic shooting of Palin were to happen the left would have to condemn their behavior of the past week and 2 years.

 

[Landis82]

Quote from Mercor:

Sometimes simple coincidences seem to have patterns when there are none.

Certainly if a tragic shooting of Palin were to happen the left would have to condemn their behavior of the past week and 2 years.

You obviously watch far too much Glenn Beck for your own good.
He's actually saying that the Republic would come crumbling down if Palin was assassinated. Really Glenn? Really?

It's amazing that McCain would pick someone so incredibly stupid for his running mate, out of all of the "available" candidates that he could have chosen.

Nice job John.
Sarah's making you look better and better with each and every year that goes by.

 

[pspr]

Quote from Mercor:

Sometimes simple coincidences seem to have patterns when there are none.

Certainly if a tragic shooting of Palin were to happen the left would have to condemn their behavior of the past week and 2 years.

They would find a way to blame it on her anyway.

 

[Landis82]

Quote from Lucrum:

More liberal stupidity.

Had some of the crowd been carrying weapons they could have shot the assassin long before he emptied his first magazine. Saving who knows how many injuries or deaths.

The point is that no one was, not even in "permit-less" Arizona.
Therefore your logic is totally false, null and void.

Mass killings like the one in Tuscon come down to the shooter being able to use permit-less, non-concealed hand-guns that can access the use of high volume magazines.

Without the ability to access high volume magazines, deranged shooters such as Loughner have the odds of killing cut down dramatically.

Thank God 74 year old retired Army Colonel Bill Badger tackled Loughner, and Patricia Maisch was able to grab the bottom of the magazine and prevent Loughner from inserting it into his weapon, and reloading . . . otherwise more people would have been killed, or wounded.

Gov. Jan Brewer has some explaining to do to the citizens of Arizona.

 

[tmarket]

Quote from bugscoe:

Opps! He Didn't Even Listen To Talk Radio...or watch TV..

Pretty much a certainty that Loughner used the internet, unless all those ramblings you have seen being quoted are all fakes.

 

[pspr]

Quote from tmarket:

Pretty much a certainty that Loughner used the internet, unless all those ramblings you have seen being quoted are all fakes.

He didn't like reading the news. He was a big gamer and a member of a large gaming community online.

 

[Hello]

This is pretty asinine view in my opinion. Do you really think that a guy who was about to go on a murderous rampage would have respected gun laws had they been in place??? Do you think this guy really gave a shit whether or not it was LEGAL to walk around with a handgun when he was about to go shoot as many people as possible??

Im sure if they had made a law against carrying a gun in public the guy would have packed up ship, turned around and decided not to murder a bunch of people, because he may be breaking a gun law, infact once he knew he didnt have a permit, he probably would have bee-tailed it to the nearest gun registry, in order to make sure he didnt break the law while he was commiting first degree murder.

Quote from Landis82:

The point is that no one was, not even in "permit-less" Arizona.
Therefore your logic is totally false, null and void.

Mass killings like the one in Tuscon come down to the shooter being able to use permit-less, non-concealed hand-guns.....

 

[bugscoe]

Quote from Hello:

This is pretty asinine view in my opinion. Do you really think that a guy who was about to go on a murderous rampage would have respected gun laws had they been in place??? Do you think this guy really gave a shit whether or not it was LEGAL to walk around with a handgun when he was about to go shoot as many people as possible??

Im sure if they had made a law against carrying a gun in public the guy would have packed up ship, turned around and decided not to murder a bunch of people, because he may be breaking a gun law, infact once he knew he didnt have a permit, he probably would have bee-tailed it to the nearest gun registry, in order to make sure he didnt break the law while he was commiting first degree murder.

Thanks for pointing out the obvious, which always proves to be a stumbling block for the idiots on the left.

 

[Hello]

I dont get why people can not think rationally when it comes to issues like this.

Quote from bugscoe:

Thanks for pointing out the obvious, which always proves to be a stumbling block for the idiots on the left.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Landis82:

The point is that no one was, not even in "permit-less" Arizona.

You're point maybe. Mine was that if someone in the crowd had been armed the damage could have easily been reduced.

Without the ability to access high volume magazines, deranged shooters such as Loughner have the odds of killing cut down dramatically.

An armed citizenry would have a similar if not bigger impact. Is a lunatic bent on murder going to choose attacking unarmed or armed targets? I'm guessing most would choose unarmed, given most of these kinds of perpetrators are cowards anyway.

Gov. Jan Brewer has some explaining to do to the citizens of Arizona.

Horse shit.

Does this response to my post constitute "stalking" me on your part? Should I PM Joe and complain like you did?

Quote from Hello:

I dont get why people can not think rationally when it comes to issues like this.

Some people do, it's the ones on the left that won't/can't think rationally on this issue. It doesn't fit the leftist dogma.