The irony of you calling anyone "tards" is incredibly high.
Open Border Democrats 2020
- Thread starter MoneyMatthew
- Start date
The irony of you calling anyone "tards" is incredibly high.
Seriously, why is it unacceptable to want to preserve the traditional character and culture of one's country? And why should legacy US citizens submit to being governed by the wishes of immigrant communities living in large cities?
Seriously, why is it unacceptable to want to preserve the traditional character and culture of one's country? And why should legacy US citizens submit to being governed by the wishes of immigrant communities living in large cities?
Some of those maps do not necessarily show the most impacted communities. Very small towns have had their culture and history decimated overnight by the federal government dumping several thousand Somali or Syrian refugees in them, for example. Whereas larger numbers may have gone to larger cities but with less impact.
Seriously, why is it unacceptable to want to preserve the traditional character and culture of one's country? And why should legacy US citizens submit to being governed by the wishes of immigrant communities living in large cities?
Don't be mad your daughters will find comfort in the arms of a black man, thanks to their Daddy issues.
This is a very good point, but I was focusing on the electoral impact. We have the dems new talking point that the electoral college, a constitutional requirement, is somehow unfair because it balances the influence of large urban areas with more sparsely populated areas.
Now we see that the dem's dominance of large urban areas is directly linked to massive immigration. It's no secret why they want to encourage voting by immigrants, many of them illegals. The much ballyhooed "popular vote" victory by Hillary was due entirely to immigrant voting in California and NY.
Throughout history in many countries, we have seen a struggle for political dominance between rural and urban areas. What is new and probably unprecedented is that massive immigration is tilting the balance and forcing legacy Americans to live under a system controlled at the margin by recent immigrants, most of whom are here illegally.
Commenting on this ("conspiracy theory" is the usual MSM putdown) or even noticing it makes one a Nazi at a minimum, unless you are a leftist gloating about it.
Massive immigration is also altering the balance of the House of Representatives. Somehow it was unconstitutional for the Census to inquire if residents are citizens or not, even though the results would be used to allocate House seats. This is how your country is being stolen from you. Trump, as usual, talked big but folded.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ants-to-take-24-house-seats-from-trump-states
The 10-year surge in illegal and legal immigration has exploded the populations of mostly Democratic states enough that the 2020 census is likely to result in the redistribution of 24 House seats in states President Trump won, according to a new population analysis released Thursday morning.
The prediction from the Center for Immigration Studies said that 26 seats overall will shift due to immigration increases since the last census was taken. And it said that a minimum of 19 of those seats will be added to Democratic states.
“Immigration profoundly redistributes political power at the federal level by changing the apportionment of House seats and votes in the Electoral College,” said the report compiled by Steven A. Camarota, the center’s director of research, and demographer Karen Zeigler.
CIS expects Ohio to be the biggest loser of House seats and California the biggest winner because many illegal and legal immigrants reside in California, and the distribution of 435 House seats is based on the national population count.
It is possible that had the shift in House seats occurred in time for the 2016 election, Hillary Rodham Clinton would have won the Electoral College vote, not Trump.
It is one of the first reports to confirm concerns that unchecked immigration, cheered by liberals, dramatically helps the Democratic Party.
The report found that the booming population of noncitizens alone will shift 10 seats. And when focused only on illegal immigration, five seats will be lost from mostly Trump states.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ants-to-take-24-house-seats-from-trump-states
The 10-year surge in illegal and legal immigration has exploded the populations of mostly Democratic states enough that the 2020 census is likely to result in the redistribution of 24 House seats in states President Trump won, according to a new population analysis released Thursday morning.
The prediction from the Center for Immigration Studies said that 26 seats overall will shift due to immigration increases since the last census was taken. And it said that a minimum of 19 of those seats will be added to Democratic states.
“Immigration profoundly redistributes political power at the federal level by changing the apportionment of House seats and votes in the Electoral College,” said the report compiled by Steven A. Camarota, the center’s director of research, and demographer Karen Zeigler.
CIS expects Ohio to be the biggest loser of House seats and California the biggest winner because many illegal and legal immigrants reside in California, and the distribution of 435 House seats is based on the national population count.
It is possible that had the shift in House seats occurred in time for the 2016 election, Hillary Rodham Clinton would have won the Electoral College vote, not Trump.
It is one of the first reports to confirm concerns that unchecked immigration, cheered by liberals, dramatically helps the Democratic Party.
The report found that the booming population of noncitizens alone will shift 10 seats. And when focused only on illegal immigration, five seats will be lost from mostly Trump states.
Indeed, and not to get too far into the weeds, but the other factor at play is that even where seats are not "lost," It is only because the candidate has had to swing further to the left to hold the seat. So, it looks like you have held the seat but you have a republican-lite, rino type in it. We will see this again when the DACA ruling comes out and that debate fires up again as Congress deals with issues that the Court has booted back to the legislative branch.