Oops! Sorry little guy, Obama screws you again.

[Trader666]

Taxpayer funding of prenatal care shows that giving libtards like you an inch is a mistake because you will demand a mile. Fact is, poor women who want prenatal care can get it through Medicaid. But that's not good enough for redistributionists like you so you want to steal even more from the productive with lies about the public choosing to let infants die. And you "rationalize" that by saying if we don't have a nanny state to make sure everyone gets prenatal care, we'll just have to pay for the consequences from cradle to grave. What's moral about stealing from productive people to subsidize (in many cases) the lazy who are not even motivated enough to make use of Medicaid? You're not "extremely fiscally conservative," you're a disingenuous troll who is desperately advocating a socialist welfare nanny state. If you're really such a caring person then donate all YOUR spare money to these "poor people," don't try to steal MINE.

Quote from bigdavediode:

Well what costs more? Prenatal care or lifetime care for a disabled child or crippled mother?

Yes, the fiscally conservative choice is "an ounce of prevention." It's also the moral choice.

 

[bigdavediode]

Quote from Trader666:

What's absolutely correct? That you're a disingenuous troll?

Also, I said SOME are freeloaders -- which is a fact -- so don't misrepresent me. And that doesn't illustrate that I "value independence over maternal health," it illustrates that I value work over welfare and personal responsibility over a nanny state.

Exactly what I wrote. It's a values thing and your values are independence and self-reliance over maternal health. Your opinions are shared by millions and that helps explain why there are more dead infants in many (or most) states than in, for example, Uruguay.

 

[Trader666]

No littledaviedumbass, YOU value welfare over work and a nanny state over personal responsibility. What a model libtard you are

Quote from bigdavediode:

your values are independence and self-reliance over maternal health

 

[bigdavediode]

Quote from Trader666:

No littledaviedumbass, YOU value welfare over work and a nanny state over personal responsibility. What a model libtard you are

Ah yes, the "No, UR A TOWEL!" response.

 

[Mnphats]

Quote from Trader666:

No littledaviedumbass, YOU value welfare over work and a nanny state over personal responsibility. What a model libtard you are

It's like talking to a brick wall, except the wall might be a better conversation.


Davie keeps regurgitating the same info in every post.

 

[AAAintheBeltway]

Quote from bigdavediode:

I would cap the military budget at the total of the top three countries in the world for military expenditures.

I would slowly change the tax structure to match the 1950's or 60's.

The health care budget is actually deficit negative, so that doesn't concern me. And as I stated above prevention is cheaper than cure.

I would index SS rates to income.

I would partially uncap the payroll tax or change the tax rate slightly (or a combination of the two); gradually increase the retirement age to 68; and adjust the inflation calculation for annual benefits slightly. Also I would reduce benefits for high earners.

I would eliminate farm subsidies. Slowly.

I would slash doctor's reimbursements from Medicare, and if they didn't like it, I would outsource Medicare doctor's services to high end clinics in Mexico. I would create a public option which would drive insurance companies' rates into the ground.

I would eliminate the Republicans' prescription drug benefit for high earners, and I would mandate caps on prescription drug costs by averaging other countries' retail prescription drug cost for the same medication. (Thus reducing expenditures on pharmaceuticals.)

I would mandate no private election expenditures by corporations, nor their principals, nor their directors by legislating that corporations are no longer people under the law. (Thus preventing future holes in the budget.) I recognize this one is problematic.

Thanks for illustrating once again that high intelligence is not a guarantee of wisdom or good judgment.

 

[bigdavediode]

Quote from AAAintheBeltway:

Thanks for illustrating once again that high intelligence is not a guarantee of wisdom or good judgment.

Okay, let's see your list. Everything on my list reduces the deficit -- can you say the same?

 

[bigdavediode]

Quote from Mnphats:

It's like talking to a brick wall, except the wall might be a better conversation.


Davie keeps regurgitating the same info in every post.

I haven't seen anyone else give concrete steps to reducing the budget deficit, except for ridiculous things like "If we slash taxes the debt will go down!" (Which is just dumb.)

 

[Mnphats]

Quote from bigdavediode:

I haven't seen anyone else give concrete steps to reducing the budget deficit, except for ridiculous things like "If we slash taxes the debt will go down!" (Which is just dumb.)

I wasn't really referring to the this, I was referring to the BS HDI, something about let babies die, and something about Uruguay.


You haven't seen any concrete steps to reduce budget deficits because 0bomba's SPENDING is the problem. I can't put my finger on how libtards view it as a taxing problem when spending is the issue, really it is that straight forward, control spending.

 

[Trader666]

Yes because at least a brick wall isn't a disingenuous libtarded troll

Quote from Mnphats:

It's like talking to a brick wall, except the wall might be a better conversation.