Ooops! Everyone re-do your costs for Global "Warming"

Quote from SNBthetrue:

so it's mean that we have 700+ years to check the problems ? Or to be fair 350+, so before the half end we are already out ot trouble ?

Could you bet if somone will be able to read our message in 700years ?
More...


WE HAVE BEEN EXPERIENCING A MINIMUM IN SUNSPOT ACTIVITY FOR THE LAST 10 YEARS!!! NOW! not 700 years in the future. NOW.

If Earth's climate reacted to the low (almost NO) sunspot activity as it has in the past, we would have experienced a world wide decline in temperature over the last 10 years, and since ice fields more efficently reflect energy back into space than anything else, once the world glaciers start to form, absent soot, or other black particulate, they take 10 to 100s of years to leave.

But we have not had a decline in temp, just a bit slower heating since 1998.
There is every reason to think that when the sunspot activity returns to normal the temperature will go up abruptly from where it is now. The sunspot minimum has just bought us something of a grace period.
 
Quote from Xspurt:

WE CAN TRUST OUR LEADERS



Well 31,486 scientists, including over 9,029 with doctorates subscribe to the following statement:

"There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth."

http://www.petitionproject.org/

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=117609
More...

Right!

PhD in Creative Golf, or Advanced Relative Smoozing.
Engineering physics, heat transfer and physical chemistry always were the flunk out courses. Not surprised, that they found 31,000 who flunked them.
 
Quote from Mnphats:

Thats because in the 70's the science community was telling us we need to worry about the next ice age and what was it in the 80's, acid rain.
More...

You know what, I am going to say you are a f**kh**d. Harsh language, but you want to know why? Because I happened to be living in Canada, in Ontario, and in a lake region during the "supposed" acid rain. Want to know what acid rain did to our lakes? Wiped them out!

Yes it wiped out huge swaths of lakes with no fish! I used to be an avid fisherman at that time, and in the Muskoka's many lakes were DEAD! With restocking, and the stopping of acid rain they have come back. But the fish kill was bad.

So this "supposed" acid rain was damaging quite a bit of nature. But of course you look back, laugh, mock and think it was just a big joke whereas I saw the end result of that joke...
 
Quote from Xspurt:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/...s-the-most-influential-tree-in-the-world.html


Here comes the wealth transfer. Bye, bye USA and Europe, hello Asia.
More...

By all means go to Asia.

I since the Yallow and the Ganges both originate in tropical glaciers, I suggest that you go take a look at where they are today, vs say in 1990. They are MILES back from where they were in 1990.

Yep, you REALLY want to be in China when the Yallow runs dry 3 months of the year.

And India, I am sure that you will be welcomed as a visionary and can explain the significance of these e-mails as the Ganges shrinks to a trickle.

And those folks that depend on the Nile? Really good folks to share water restriction with. Really.
 
Quote from christianhgross:

You know what, I am going to say you are a f**kh**d. Harsh language, but you want to know why? Because I happened to be living in Canada, in Ontario, and in a lake region during the "supposed" acid rain. Want to know what acid rain did to our lakes? Wiped them out!

Yes it wiped out huge swaths of lakes with no fish! I used to be an avid fisherman at that time, and in the Muskoka's many lakes were DEAD! With restocking, and the stopping of acid rain they have come back. But the fish kill was bad.

So this "supposed" acid rain was damaging quite a bit of nature. But of course you look back, laugh, mock and think it was just a big joke whereas I saw the end result of that joke...
More...

Stopping of acid rain? HOW did you stop the acid rain?? Magically it stopped overnight? All the fish came back in a few years?

You are a shell....Quit spreading the global warming, man-made shit!

How does acid rain kill fish, then within a few months they come back (where did they restock from....CA lakes??)...THINK about it.

Our ecosystem is way more complicated than we can ever grasp. It has been through ice ages, floods, dark sky's, volcanoes (Which emit the most CO2 of all)

Keep your shit in Canada, and leave the best Country alone with ur france shit!!
 
Quote from NKNY:

and IMO, to subject us to things like cap and tax because of an unproven theory that Gore and his like are pushing is crazy.... It's obvious their is a big agenda behind this man made crises... It is no longer science, they have turned into politics...

Nick
More...

For me the problem is even bigger... I think that we made a big mistake by thinking that China and Russia have converted to freedom as we know it...

I think that both of the implosion ( explosion going inside... ) were done voluntarly to bring all the technologies that we have inside their empire...

However both knew that their empire were so huge that never the view of the west will be able to change them...

In the meantime they will get access to our political system, and trough a coordinate attack put them down. And win the cold war...

It's called the Trojan Horse inversed^^

Quote from Stok:

I hope they can read our messages when it comes.
More...

Yeah... I am pretty sure it will not be a human... I mean sooner or later Atrificial intelligence will rise. He/she or "it" will be ALL the digital knowledge + all the world data in a "spirit".

So it will be known that some didn't fall and like crazy were standing facing the wind of the MsM
 
Scientists exist for one reason and one reason alone. And that being proving other scientists wrong. :p

Oh, Global warming defensively exists, just in the winter season.
 
Researcher: NASA hiding climate data

The fight over global warming science is about to cross the Atlantic with a U.S. researcher poised to sue NASA, demanding release of the same kind of climate data that has landed a leading British center in hot water over charges it skewed its data.

Chris Horner, a senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, said NASA has refused for two years to provide information under the Freedom of Information Act that would show how the agency has shaped its climate data and would explain why the agency has repeatedly had to correct its data going as far back as the 1930s.

"I assume that what is there is highly damaging," Mr. Horner said. "These guys are quite clearly bound and determined not to reveal their internal discussions about this."

The numbers matter. Under pressure in 2007, NASA recalculated its data and found that 1934, not 1998, was the hottest year in its records for the contiguous 48 states. NASA later changed that data again, and now 1998 and 2006 are tied for first...

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/dec/03/researcher-says-nasa-hiding-climate-data/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top