Maybe the solar panels aren't clean? They need to offer clean solar panel jobs to compete with all the clean coal jobs.
Windmills are and interesting dilemma. I was traveling through France last summer and was surprised by the great number of windmills everywhere we drove, from the northwest to the northeast of the country. But I learned later that France actually has few of them compared to many other European nations.It's not unusual to see "no windmills" signs when driving through the midwest....like wtf?
Seriously?!? These are all Trumpists farmers who are generational Republicans and fear anything different.This particular solar project was rejected due to pressure from lefty environmentalists if you read the article fully.
We have the same crowd of people demanding rejection of a solar plant and new sub-divisions near where I live in Durham citing run-off, reduction in farmland, etc. These folks are from the environmentalist left.
Seriously?!? These are all Trumpists farmers who are generational Republicans and fear anything different.
Solar panels, while not the worst polluter for power generation are not necessarily good for the environment.Solar panels ... dont damage the.environment. You lose.acres of land but get way more out.of it than soybeans.
Key arguments against solar panels are that they require more energy and fossil fuel-burning equipment to mine, manufacture, and transport than they save. Another argument is that toxic chemicals are used in the manufacturing process which do more harm than good.
Did you read the article?Solar panels, while not the worst polluter for power generation are not necessarily good for the environment.
https://kubyenergy.ca/blog/the-positive-and-negative-environmental-impacts-of-solar-panels
Incredibly doubtful (citation needed), then again you fall for anything and right wingers posing as lefties is an old grift (Kyrsten Sinema as "green party", Manchin as "pro average Joe", Bari Weiss & Dave Rubin as "pro-free speech", etc...).This particular solar project was rejected due to pressure from lefty environmentalists if you read the article fully.
We have the same crowd of people demanding rejection of a solar plant and new sub-divisions near where I live in Durham citing run-off, reduction in farmland, etc. These folks are from the environmentalist left.
Windmills are and interesting dilemma. I was traveling through France last summer and was surprised by the great number of windmills everywhere we drove, from the northwest to the northeast of the country. But I learned later that France actually has few of them compared to many other European nations.
In the US, I lived in California where most windmills are concentrated in specific areas, like Livermore in the north or Alta down in LA. Other than those, it's not so common to see windmills in CA.
Yes. My comment was replying to someone else's post, not the article.Did you read the article?
I much prefer them over panels due to land use (if talking green land).
Solar panels, while not the worst polluter for power generation are not necessarily good for the environment.
https://kubyenergy.ca/blog/the-positive-and-negative-environmental-impacts-of-solar-panels