Are you going to mentor wheelbarrow in the ways of being a lunatic, libtard troll? After all, you did win piece of shit of the year, er... Troll of the year for 2013.
One reason liberals are idiots when it comes to global warming
- Thread starter gastropod
- Start date
Are you going to mentor wheelbarrow in the ways of being a lunatic, libtard troll? After all, you did win piece of shit of the year, er... Troll of the year for 2013.
There you go! Good job! In typical libturd fashion, throw up another joke of a chart, deflect, evade, then run away. Troll of the year, you are. Smart, you could never be accused of.
You should stick to cartoons if you want to communicate with leap.
In that same study... my sample of the papers showed that less than one percent of the papers showed any real science saying man made co2 has causes significant warming.
Which of course is the real issue.
there is no science showing man made co2 has caused warming on our planet because co2 is also a coolant and no one has proven any sort of net effect.
another factor is that using the best statistical methods there is no showing we have warmed outside natural variability.
Which of course is the real issue.
there is no science showing man made co2 has caused warming on our planet because co2 is also a coolant and no one has proven any sort of net effect.
another factor is that using the best statistical methods there is no showing we have warmed outside natural variability.
Isnât it remarkable that among the legions of scientists working around the world, many with tenured positions, secure reputations and largely nothing to lose, not even a hundred out of ten thousand come forward to deny the phenomenon in the scientific literature? Should it be that hard for them to publish papers if the evidence is really good enough? Even detractors of the peer review system would disagree that the system is that broken; after all, studies challenging consensus are quite common in other disciplines. So are contrarian climate scientists around the world so utterly terrified of their colleagues and world opinion that they would not dare to hazard a contrarian explanation at all, especially if it were based on sound science? The belief stretches your imagination to new lengths.
Those who think scientists keep silent on global warming presumably because they fear the barbs of the world demonstrate a peculiar kind of paranoia, especially since what they fear largely does not exist. More prosaically they need to recall Carl Saganâs words again because the claim that scientist donât dare to speak out against global warming in the literature is, quite definitely, an extraordinary claim. And it doesnât seem to stand up to even ordinary evidence.
This chart should tell us why we need to move the debate beyond the fundamental fact of global warming, from disputing the basic science and effects of the process to disputing the details of consequences and the proposed solutions.
Those who think scientists keep silent on global warming presumably because they fear the barbs of the world demonstrate a peculiar kind of paranoia, especially since what they fear largely does not exist. More prosaically they need to recall Carl Saganâs words again because the claim that scientist donât dare to speak out against global warming in the literature is, quite definitely, an extraordinary claim. And it doesnât seem to stand up to even ordinary evidence.
This chart should tell us why we need to move the debate beyond the fundamental fact of global warming, from disputing the basic science and effects of the process to disputing the details of consequences and the proposed solutions.
Interesting point, but you really should cite your source when you copy, word for word, other people's material. That's called Plagiarism.
And, from the comments section of that blog post, the only really relevant comment worthwhile to post in retort:
less than 41 of 11,000 papers suggested man made co2 caused warming.
you are a crack pot citing debunked (by peer review) garbage stats from an al gore whore.
you are a crack pot citing debunked (by peer review) garbage stats from an al gore whore.
FC never posts any new or interesting information. He is a member of an organized "crusher crew" started by Skeptical Science and other groups who sole intent is to "drown out" those who do not accept their alarmist global warming positions.
You can probably find other cross posts of this plagiarized information across the web; FC and his buddies tend to re-cycle the same nonsense over and over again.