Quote from denner:
It's just another political argument. If the author had spent his time praising Krugman or citing some manipulated economic stat in support of central planning, we'd have all the leftists on here in favor of the article.
Maybe 10% of the time can you get an honest debate about any of these issues. Hell, why even continue to debate the article itself; why not just ask these central planning zealots how well the Bernanke policies are working?
The article was just to illustrate the point that the Fed can't control unemployment, and therefore shouldn't have a dual mandate (like every other Central Bank in the world). Getting into the wording of the article was never my objective. But since bigarrow only wanted to focus on the wording, I had to do my best to try to explain what the author was going for. That ended up being a waste of time.