On the Daily Show, Obama is the last laugh
- Thread starter Trader666
- Start date
More lame, desperate excuses from the uneducated libtard. For future reference, "Steward" is NOT the correct spelling of the last name of the person you were writing about.
Ah... so it's OK for you to spam this forum with numerous "holier than thou" posts about how educated liberals supposedly are, yet when you show your colossal ignorance, that's off topic? You're a total joke... an uneducated, hypocritical libtarded joke
Here are your democrap heroes on weapons of mass destruction, you ignoramus.
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Cwqh4wQPoQk?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Cwqh4wQPoQk?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Cwqh4wQPoQk?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Cwqh4wQPoQk?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
When you continually post about the intellectual deficiencies of the Right and then can't express yourself in proper grammatical context, you open yourself up for such criticism. Crying about it (leftist favorite pastime it seems) only makes you out to be a hypocrite and childish yourself, something you supposedly decry.
Grammar mistakes does not mean a person is intellectually deficient or uneducated . Take a look at George Bush's butchering of the English language and he is both educated and intelligent.
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KogebxJkHig?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KogebxJkHig?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
Stewart could have destroyed him.
That was about as light as Stewart could tread being that Stewart did not want to piss off his viewers.
It was odd, Stewart was trying to shrink himself and his gravitas.
Obama was leaning in and back, doing everything he could to seem Presidential and take control and Stewart wanted him to. But, the facts are his accomplishments shrunk him to having almost no presence. he is lucky to have some level of natural charisma. Part of me was hoping he would do better.
You do not look at him and despise him. The way many did with bush and clinton.
That was about as light as Stewart could tread being that Stewart did not want to piss off his viewers.
It was odd, Stewart was trying to shrink himself and his gravitas.
Obama was leaning in and back, doing everything he could to seem Presidential and take control and Stewart wanted him to. But, the facts are his accomplishments shrunk him to having almost no presence. he is lucky to have some level of natural charisma. Part of me was hoping he would do better.
You do not look at him and despise him. The way many did with bush and clinton.