On Tea Party being a fake movement

[IShopAtPublix]

Quote from Lucrum:

And you wonder why no one is bothering to "debate" with you.

Anybody who puts a tea bag on his head and then gets offended when called a teabagger is a moron. This taxed enough already is the biggest load of a crap I have ever seen. It has nothing to do with the original historical tea party.

 

[futurecurrents]

Quote from IShopAtPublix:

It does not matter what their alleged private political persuasions are. Nobody out of the numbnuts that trash my post took issue with the facts and conclusions expressed in the article (because they did not read it) they just wanted to bash me as a poster.

Republican party has one core demographic - rich well entrenched WASP elite. Everyone else exists to advance the interests of that group. Tea Party created a semblance of faux grass roots movement and generated enough auxiliary enthusiasm for republicans to help them in 2010. The republican elite never intended some stupid hillbillies (which is what tea party is) to tell them what to do or challenge them for party leadership. The problems Boehner had with some freshmen congressmen are well documented. Since revolutions "eat their children" what you will see is a gradual phase out of the so-called "tea party" through primaries and withdrawal of support from fox and koch brothers.

Pretty much agree here. Well said. Except stupid hillbillies is a little off. More like stupid, old, paranoid, xenophobic, racist, reactionary white guys.

 

[Max E.]

Its funny how you guys are bitching about fox news promoting the tea party as if it wasnt happening when occupy wallstreet first came out with the left wing media.

Of course the big difference is that the tea partiers were able to protest in peace without getting violent and committing one felony after another.

The occupy wallstreet turned into far to big of a filthy crime infested cesspool for the left wing media to keep promoting them, so they were forced to give up on them, because they became a huge liability to the left. The reason the left wing media had to give up on promoting occupy wallstreet is because they were unable to act like civilised human beings.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from IShopAtPublix:

Anybody who puts a tea bag on his head and then gets offended when called a teabagger is a moron.

No but anyone who arrogantly believes this stupid remark certainly is.

This taxed enough already is the biggest load of a crap I have ever seen.

NOT for those of us actually paying the taxes it's not.

It has nothing to do with the original historical tea party.

More ignorant horse shit you've fabricated to support your own preconceived notions.

 

[futurecurrents]

Quote from Max E. Pad:

Its funny how you guys are bitching about fox news promoting the tea party as if it wasnt happening when occupy wallstreet first came out with the left wing media.

Of course the big difference is that the tea partiers were able to protest in peace without getting violent and committing one felony after another.

The occupy wallstreet turned into far to big of a filthy crime infested cesspool for the left wing media to keep promoting them, so they were forced to give up on them, because they became a huge liability to the left. The reason the left wing media had to give up on promoting occupy wallstreet is because they were unable to act like civilised human beings.

Any proof of this left-wing media promotion of OWS ?


BTW. If the Tea Party and OWS had a rumble who would win?

On one hand you have unarmed peaceniks but they're young and strong

on the other you have pissed-off, paranoid gun-nuts but they're so old their reaction times and strength is pretty low

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from futurecurrents:

Any proof of this left-wing media promotion of OWS ?

LOL are you serious?

BTW. If the Tea Party and OWS had a rumble who would win?

On one hand you have unarmed peaceniks but they're young and strong

on the other you have pissed-off, paranoid gun-nuts but they're so old their reaction times and strength is pretty low

Tea party obviously. With or without guns.

 

[Trader666]

Wrong again, imbecile

Poll Finds Tea Party Backers Wealthier and More Educated
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/15/us/politics/15poll.html

Quote from IShopAtPublix:

...stupid hillbillies (which is what tea party is)...

 

[Trader666]

You wouldn't be able to detect reality if it slapped you in the face.

Quote from futurecurrents:

Any proof of this left-wing media promotion of OWS ?

If you "think" it, it's probably wrong.

Quote from futurecurrents:

BTW. If the Tea Party and OWS had a rumble who would win?

On one hand you have unarmed peaceniks but they're young and strong

on the other you have pissed-off, paranoid gun-nuts but they're so old their reaction times and strength is pretty low

 

[Max E.]

Quote from Lucrum:


Tea party obviously. With or without guns.

There is simply nothing in this world that is less intimidating then an unbathed, hipster in a fedora and a Che Guevara t-shirt, who is too stoned walk properly......

 

[377OHMS]

Quote from Max E. Pad:

There is simply nothing in this world that is less intimidating then an unbathed, hipster in a fedora and a Che Guevara t-shirt, who is too stoned walk properly......

lol. Your typical leftist "soldier" right there Max.

Futurecurrents is so butt-hurt over being crushed on climate issues that he has become a real hater and doesn't believe much of what he is saying. He is acting out his need to lash out at those who have disputed his worldview and pointed out the nonsense of his science and beliefs. He is just another child running around in P&R trying to get a rise out of folks.

The very idea of the right vs. the left in a military conflict is a rather appealing thought though, if you ask me anyways.