Quote from Maverick74:
Let me also add that traders need to be very careful what they wish for. Although I think the paid for training model is out of control, there is a place in the business for these low entry firms. The fact of the matter is 99% of the guys on ET could not get Goldman, Citadel or even a Transmarket Group to return a phone call much less get an interview. So the fact that there are firms out there that will open the door and let guys in with little to no experience is really the only shot a lot of guys on here have.
My criticism of Don, and I think it's a legit one, is the dogmatic devotion to pairtrading and that singular focus. This business is very tough and competitive and Don and his brother actually have the resources to venture into new waters like futures and options where 98% of the REAL prop firms trade, and yet they stay the course. I almost admire that devotion except that Don does come on here and sell it like an ice cream cone on a hot summer day.
But I agree, in a sea full of sharks, Don has kept his doors open long enough to be respected and should be. And I always welcome debate with him in person as well as on ET.
Quote from EPrado:
I am surprised that more firms don't get into the futures markets. All I have heard from my equity trading friends the last few years is "these stocks suck...they don't trade like they used to". It gets worse each year. The firms they trade for are very reluctant to let them trade futures...probably because futures don't generate nearly the same amount of commissions the firms make on equities. The traders would be MUCH better off P/L wise in futures.....but then the firms would keep less and pay out more to their traders.
Quote from Maverick74:
Bingo! Stocks are a much better commission generator then futures. What's better then stock? Pairs!!!! Double the flavor, double the fun. I would like to have a serious conversation with Don on here about pairs trading.
Quote from scorpion:
don always says. no one makes money on directional trading. its gambling. most experienced traders would probably disagree with that viewpoint. the fact is probably most traders & various funds make their money taking directional trades. bright does like to encourage various strategies with the idea of generating more commission dollars for the firm but not always with the traders profitability in mind. however don is a straight shooter & friendly for the most if you agree with his viewpoint .. their niche is for short term traders with flexible leverage for position trading within reason. they are not your typical daytrading firm with their non competitive commissions. just a good way to burn up your capital trying to daytrade with bright. a good firm if it fits your style of trading. to each his own.
Quote from Maverick74:
Let me also add that traders need to be very careful what they wish for. Although I think the paid for training model is out of control, there is a place in the business for these low entry firms. The fact of the matter is 99% of the guys on ET could not get Goldman, Citadel or even a Transmarket Group to return a phone call much less get an interview. So the fact that there are firms out there that will open the door and let guys in with little to no experience is really the only shot a lot of guys on here have.
My criticism of Don, and I think it's a legit one, is the dogmatic devotion to pairtrading and that singular focus. This business is very tough and competitive and Don and his brother actually have the resources to venture into new waters like futures and options where 98% of the REAL prop firms trade, and yet they stay the course. I almost admire that devotion except that Don does come on here and sell it like an ice cream cone on a hot summer day.
But I agree, in a sea full of sharks, Don has kept his doors open long enough to be respected and should be. And I always welcome debate with him in person as well as on ET.