@Sprout
Happy I could help.
A caveat... take care with "Jacks" charts with respect to B-Band and beyond. There is a minimal number of "examples", and as has been discussed, a strong likelihood, annotation done by a student. Even your posted example is dubious... a P1 is rayed just after the P2. How can T2P and T2F immediately following a P1 be correct? Answer, one or more mis-annotations. And look at the corresponding price pane!!
This is how I see that sequence.
All bars degapped.
Bar71, XR, PP1, BM.
Bar72, XR is assigned P1 yet the geometry is not immediately supporting a reversal. It is logged as a C D-D turn.
Bar73, Ftp, T1 closing above the BM. No rtl is possible atm.
Bar74, StB is wait and is annotated as a lat3 but the price formation with the assigned P1 degapped does not support that interpretation. It does close below the BM, so BM,rev and assigned P1.
Bar75, XR, P1
Bar76, XR, P1 but no acceleration, therefore notPP1
Bar77, Ftp, wait. However the annotations on the price pane is that this is lat6, so no wait. They appear to contradict each other. Upon closer examination of the price pane, the programmed boxes around the price pane is not based on degapping. Therefore, the thought is that the lateral numbers above the price bars are programmed in this same way as well.
Bar78, XR, special case Ja or Ah. One would explain a P1 on bar79.
The other possibility is that bar78 and bar79 could be reversed in their annotation which would make the T2P, T2F and Fa valid. However that would make bar78 a P1. If it was a P1 then it also has to have an advance one peak to validate Ja or Ah. Ja would assign on next, Ah this bar. Still hmmm,..
The aha (for me)
Going back to bar79, bar when degapped is really an StB. StB with lower volume is an internal, so wait. If this is a wait, then the P2,T2P, T2F to Fa become valid again. The P1 annotation of this bar is therefore an artifact and debriefing would correct the sequence to retain a more accurate record.
IMO, we are mostly on our own, beyond a few words from Jack regarding B-band and beyond. Thinking in terms of M1-M2-M3 associated with containers has a lot of value. Just saying.
Agreed, it is such an elegant, powerful principal and informs constantly.
What I find strange about B-band(T2P) and beyond is why the prescribed process is so difficult to get there? Much due to FS (imo). The tenet is that all fractals complete simultaneously. So what are we looking at on screen if at no time a sequence actually completes? In my thinking, something is amiss, because there are clearly completed sequences, at least from time to time on the viewing resolution. A few, which I think is closer to none, that I have seen in the training materials.
The way I see that is that similar to music, there are various instruments that play their respect roles, have their individual voices (call and response) and at certain points there is a synchronization, all landing on a beat. The Modrian table does this with the ID'ing of the c turns. The part that I'm currently working out is when an a turn takes price below the previous c turn's BM and that trend appears to have the a and b turns inverted from what I associate a and b turns to be.
