Are you saying that price stops are an ineffective method of managing risk as it comes at too high a price???
Are you suggesting a trader should average down??
Do you differentiate between day trading and investing??
"ONLY" a 50% drawdown??? Do you not make a distinction between a 10 stock portfolio vs a single asset??
Do you trade?
Are you suggesting a trader should average down??
Do you differentiate between day trading and investing??
"ONLY" a 50% drawdown??? Do you not make a distinction between a 10 stock portfolio vs a single asset??
Do you trade?
The article used 50% as an arbitrary number to use as an example. Obviously if a stock drops 50% it's a capitulation and you will have to wait for a recovery. The part about the article that makes no sense is showing that after only a 50% drop, the stock/portfolio now has to recover 100% just to reach break even...implying that it will be harder for a stock or portfolio to recover, and that traders need to mitigate losses because of this. This is a fallacy
