Oldest dinosaur nest site found

Quote from rew:

I was unaware that all of the respondents to that poll post here on ET.

Do the young earthers trade forex, futures, options, stocks, or bonds? Just wondering...
More...

Your first sentence is both disingenous and demonstrates you lack an even rudimentary understanding of statistics.

Your second sentence seems to imply that traders as a population are significantly different to the general population on this topic. I see no evidence for that but it might be interesting to find out.
 
Quote from peilthetraveler:

Radiometric dating. They figure out how old the rocks are by examining the decay rates (half-lifes) of isotopes. Are measuring decay rates accurate...maybe...maybe not. You decide.

The earths magnetic field has a half life of 1400 years. This would point that the earth has an upper age limit of about 10,000 years.

http://www.icr.org/article/depletion-earths-magnetic-field/

Scientists admit the sun is shrinking at a rate of 5 feet per second. This means that 100,000 years ago, the sun would be twice the size it is now. It also means that 20 million years ago the sun would've been so large that the earth would've been inside the sun. Kind of hard for evolution to take place when your planet is inside the sun, dont you think?
http://www.icr.org/article/sun-shrinking/

As for dinosaurs roaming with man...there is plenty of evidence. Ankor wat in cambodia has an 800 year old stone carving of a stegosaurus.

Stegosaurus


On the other side of the world....1000-1500 year old burial stones with carvings of dinosaurs and man TOGETHER.

A tricerotops and a man riding it.
incastone01x.jpg


A man stabbing what looks like a raptorex in the head (A small version of T-rex that weighed about 150 pounds)

incastone02x.jpg


There are literally 100s of examples of evidence that man and dinosaur walked together, but its largely ignored.

Take the coelacanth for example. Scientists said they went extinct 65 million years ago. Somewhere they even have a "360 million year old fossil" of one. Yet go to this website and you will see a live living coelacanth.

http://www.mnh.si.edu/highlight/coelacanth/

So how can a coelacanth remain unchanged for 360 million years when supposedly humans went from being a worm to a human in that time? If everything is constantly evolving...why didnt they evolve? How can a coelacanth start off as a protien and slowly evolve over millions of years into a coelacanth and then just stop evolving for no reason? Because evolution is a joke, thats why. Its the wool pulled over your eyes so you can more easily ignore the fact that there might be a God who created everything.

The evidence is out there if you just look for it and dont let the bias of your elementary school dinosaur education affect you.
More...

Gotta admit piel, the Ankor Wat piece of that clip was compelling.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

So the Flintstones was based on fact !!

In recent related news...

"Step aside, DNA—new synthetic compounds called XNAs can also store and copy genetic information, a new study says.

And, in a "big advancement," these artificial compounds can also be made to evolve in the lab, according to study co-author John Chaput of the Biodesign Institute at Arizona State University.

First, researchers made XNA building blocks to six different genetic systems by replacing the natural sugar component of DNA with one of six different polymers, synthetic chemical compounds.

The team—led by Vitor Pinheiro of the U.K.'s Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology—then evolved enzymes, called polymerases, that can make XNA from DNA, and others that can change XNA back into DNA.

This copying and translating ability allowed for genetic sequences to be copied and passed down again and again—artificial heredity.

Last, the team determined that HNA, one of the six XNA polymers, could respond to selective pressure in a test tube.

As would be expected for DNA, the stressed HNA evolved into different forms.

This shows that "beyond heredity, specific XNAs have the capacity for Darwinian evolution," according to the study, published tomorrow in the journal Science. (Read "Darwin's Legacy" in National Geographic magazine.)

"Thus, heredity and evolution, two hallmarks of life, are not limited to DNA and RNA."

XNA Could Demystify Origins of Life?

All of XNA'S actions are "completely controlled by experimentalists—it's 100 percent unnatural," study co-author Chaput noted.

But such control means that scientists can "use [XNA] to ask very basic questions in biology," such as about the origins of life, Chaput said.

For instance, "it's possible that life didn't begin with DNA and proteins like we see today—it may have begun with something much, much simpler," he said.

A scientist could potentially evolve XNA to discover various functions that would have been important for early life.

Overall, he said, the new discovery is "pretty cool—and very powerful.""

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/...ynthetic-dna-evolution-genetics-life-science/
More...

Now, if Art Bell were still broadcasting, he would have spent a week on this at least. This is evidence that our planet could have been seeded by a superior group of humanoids.

What say ye?

You might be too young to know who Art Bell was, Google him.
 
I don't know about anyone else but I never seen a picture of a dinosaur with genitals, maybe that's why they're extinct.
 
Quote from Dragons Teeth:

Ok its just you. :D
More...
While I'm sure the weight of my logic seems to be overwhelming and "many" to you, I can assure you I don't believe the earth's age is merely 6,000 revolutions around the sun.
 
Quote from RCG Trader:

Now, if Art Bell were still broadcasting, he would have spent a week on this at least. This is evidence that our planet could have been seeded by a superior group of humanoids.

What say ye?

You might be too young to know who Art Bell was, Google him.
More...

Yeah, didn't know Art Bell. Interesting fellow and interesting discussions from the sound of it.

Seeded? It's possible, but in my opinion highly unlikely.

First of all, it was not needed to start life. Conditions on early earth were good enough.

Second is the simple question of why an advanced race would do so and given the obstacle of interstellar distances it would make gardening young earth an expensive proposition. And the best they could do is seed it with a bunch of very basic proto-life varieties and then let them sort themselves out and evolve on there own. The ultimate decider of which species arise and survive still has to be earth itself.


I think it more likely that some germs may have been splashed over to earth from mars. But again, conditions on early earth were probably at least as amenable to life creation as early mars was.



You want to believe we are the product of little green men from Neepzorb don't you? :)
 
"As for dinosaurs roaming with man...there is plenty of evidence. Ankor wat in cambodia has an 800 year old stone carving of a stegosaurus. "


There is similar evidence for dragons having been real.

One possibility:

Mankind has created all types of fanciful images and purely by the huge number of such, some will look like aliens, some will look like Gods, some will look like half man and half horse and some will look like dinosaurs.

Another possibility is that men have been finding fossils ever since they started digging in the ground and exploring new lands. Imagine a Bronze Age sheep herder finding a stegosaurus fossil sticking out of some hill. What kind of myths might that start?

Another possibility is virtually all modern science is wrong and dinosaurs did walk with Homo Sapiens. :eek:
 
Quote from nutmeg:

I don't know about anyone else but I never seen a picture of a dinosaur with genitals, maybe that's why they're extinct.
More...

Ah ha! Proof that even God can make a mistake. Or maaayybe the Devil did it. He's so cruel that he made them eunuchs.
 
So far as I can tell, peilthetraveler is the only bona fide young earther here on ET. Still far from "many".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top