You have seen the quality of my NQ trading, and you ask me that? I quit trading individual stocks four years ago after I got screwed one too many times by insider shenanigans. That was about the same time that a paradigm shift occurred and idiots could no longer reliably make money. I think I understand PV relationships in NQ, but their major components? It might be that the same stuff that works for NQ might work, though. For example, you can pretty much take volume anomalies to the bank. Lower volume on a double-botomy, par exemple. (Although that took you to the cleaners today!) Or lower volume on a higher high or lower low (that did work a few times today). Need to pull that stunt when volume is high, though. But those observations are all in Jackean hindsight, like drawing carnals. (Oh, I do miss DB so. He was such a snot about hindsight!) IMO there is a sort of one-way ergodicity at work in the NAZ 100. The ensemble average is useful, but it doesn't help you much predicting individual expected values. I like NQ because even though it is a rigged game the rules don't change much. Not so IMO with individual stocks.
An afterthought: The NAZ 100 IS unique as an index because it is dominated by a small fraction of its components. There is an edge there. Or an edge of an edge. Or maybe not.
