OK time to contribute something serious, my analysis of OIL using my edge

Here's an excerpt from an interview with Arjun Murti, Goldman Sachs oil analyst:


At which point you probably see a falloff in demand, right?

We are already starting to see a drop in demand in the U.S., but they are still having demand growth in the non-OECD countries, including China, the Middle East and Asia. The OECD countries are mainly the U.S., Europe and Japan. The real question: At what point do the non-OECD economies slow down? The other thing about U.S. demand is, at what point do you have sustainable change in consumer behavior? So if the price temporarily goes to $4 [a gallon], but immediately falls back to $3, it's likely that people will keep driving cars with poor gasoline mileage. But if people believe the increase in oil prices is more sustainable, they might shift to taking mass transportation, if available, driving hybrids or taking the other kind of actions that are necessary to reduce demand on a sustained basis.

Do you see a sustained drop in demand at $200 a barrel?

That is the big question. We have always assumed that, at some point, you get a sustained drop in demand. Our long-term oil forecast looking out 20 years is to fall back to $75 a barrel, or some lower number. The questions are: How long do prices stay high? How sharply do they rise? And do people truly change their behavior or are they just temporarily driving less? It's an unknown at this point.
 
Quote from Babak:

It walks like a bubble and quacks like a bubble, it is probably a bubble. Check out the long term chart of the price of crude adjusted for inflation, and you'll see what I mean.

It dwarfs the oil shocks we saw in '79 and the Persian Gulf war. I have no inside info on demand/supply but I do know that those who have said before "this time is different" have always been wrong, about any market... gold, silver, real estate, etc.

Babak, unfortunately the "traders narrative" article you cite is rendered nonsensical by the use of a log y-axis in the first plot and a linear y-axis with no y-axis labels, None!, in the second plot. Changing the scale of the y-axis to suit one's arguments is and old ploy of propagandists everywhere. This is "trick" that none of us should put up with. It's absurd!!!

:mad: :mad: :mad:

In reality, a weak dollar is a significant factor in the present price of crude expressed in dollars.
 
The insouciant one is back. Good for you Kid.

It is reasonable to be concerned about the possibility that Israel might strike Iran's enrichment facilities. Let's hope not, but it could happen. And the oil markets will respond to the extent that an attack is seen as more or less likely. If it should happen prior to the American election in the Fall I would see it as a boldface attempt by Israel, with the backing of American Zionists and likely as not with the tacit approval of the Bush administration, to interfere with the election outcome. They are desperate to put McCain into the White House.

I would hope any such attempt would backfire on them, but who knows? The hardliner Israelis are ruthless, and seemingly would prefer endless war to the slightest concession for peace. So far they have achieved nothing in 60 years of killing and fighting with their neighbors. As Einstein famously said, insanity is to keep doing the same thing and expect different results.


Quote from C- kid:

I don't care for these things as I simply trade regardless of direction

But something caught my eye

this jump in oil, there is more here than meets the eye,

what none of you understand is that oil companies using proxies make up a large portion of speculators, driving their own profits higher with portion of their profits

they simply call it, investing and expanding their own business

but there is more, by looking at this oil jump I concluded using my superior intellect that ATTACK ON IRAN IS IMMANENT

this is exactly the PUT options buying before 9/11

there will be blood for oil and it will happen soon
 
Quote from piezoe:

Changing the scale of the y-axis to suit one's arguments is and old ploy of propagandists everywhere. This is "trick" that none of us should put up with. It's absurd!!!

:mad: :mad: :mad:

In reality, a weak dollar is a significant factor in the present price of crude expressed in dollars.

piezoe,
you're right that the axis is not shown in the second graph. I could easily add it, there is no "ploy" LoL and no axis was "changed" I like clean simple graphs so I didn't use an axis on the second graph. The two graphs are obviously showing different things and I never suggested that they share an axis! LoL

In any case, you don't really need an axis explicit in that second chart because the units are plotted (the lines) and the whole point is to show the relative magnitude of this oil shock, compared to previous ones.

As for the role of a weak dollar, I would agree with you that is is certainly part of the puzzle and contributing to the price of oil here. I had a few other people suggest the same thing, which is why I graphed oil priced in gold - seeing how it has been on a tear these past few years and how many consider it the only real "money". As you can see from that graph, oil is still expensive, even when priced in gold!
 
Quote from Babak:

piezoe,
you're right that the axis is not shown in the second graph. I could easily add it, there is no "ploy" I
Yes there is a ploy robert/babak. You desperately want views so you can sell t-shirts. Why must you always pimp your crappy blog? If you DON'T have an agenda, just make a statement, without links.

Folks, this is the real weisel robert/babak. He's tried to make a name for himself by bashing other successful traders. When that has failed (see below), he quickly forgets his repugnant actions. Now he's been reduced to begging ET members to read his crappy blog.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from Mr. Gates:

1) You repeatedly emailed a successful website operator insisting he tell you his methodology for making winning trades.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from Babak:

Everything you have said is absolutely and categorically false.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from Babak:

afford me the opportunity to set the record straight.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from Babak:

I don't have the time to go into each one
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

He wanted to set the record straight, then "didn't have time" to do so. Running like a chicken is his specialty.

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=113651&perpage=6&pagenumber=15

rr/babak loves to get free info and help. But when he doesn't get it, he has no problem smearing and slandering. What a guy!
 
Quote from C- kid:

my superior intellect that ATTACK ON IRAN IS IMMANENT

I would think your superior intelligence would have spelled the word as IMMINENT.

IF Israel attacks Iran, price of crude will fall.
 
Quote from polpolik:

I would think your superior intelligence would have spelled the word as IMMINENT.

IF Israel attacks Iran, price of crude will fall.

spell check screwed me, cause there are both words in existence

god damn spell check

if a man can't trust the spell check, what can he trust in this day and age :mad:............:p
 
Quote from C- kid:

I have no love for Iran but it seems wrong to make money on deaths of others

AFAIK there have not yet been any confirmed fatalities caused by purchasing oil futures.
 
Back
Top