OK, give me a ticker you think would most offset QQQ losses so I can test...

But what's the point? They'll practically cancel each other out, no? You might as well just park your cash in T-bills and collect interest.
My point is posted in my first response, go check it out and if questions remain, let me know.
 
But what's the point? They'll practically cancel each other out, no? You might as well just park your cash in T-bills and collect interest.

I think OP point was to try to find something that can inverse the QQQ as a lead into what the QQQ might do in the near future. And in truth, there is nothing that leads it outside empirical data, which is lagging anyways. I mean as far as I am concerned, overall, in general, over a long time-frame, the ZN is best inverse. Hell, we all know gold has been pointless. Oil is pointless.

There is no true leading indicator of another instrument that can predict the QQQ's movement. Tech-heavy shit like that? It's just the Fed.
 
I think OP point was to try to find something that can inverse the QQQ as a lead into what the QQQ might do in the near future. And in truth, there is nothing that leads it outside empirical data, which is lagging anyways. I mean as far as I am concerned, overall, in general, over a long time-frame, the ZN is best inverse. Hell, we all know gold has been pointless. Oil is pointless.

There is no true leading indicator of another instrument that can predict the QQQ's movement. Tech-heavy shit like that? It's just the Fed.
Why he don't say so hisself?


offsets the losses
What do you want?
Lika Dis or Lika Dat?
Or neither?
delete.png


 
Break it down into simple terms.
If QQQ moves 10 UP
What do you want from the successful candidate of your search?
10 DOWN?
Yes or no


No. I spelled it out above what I am looking for. I would say a successful candidate would go up (gain money) over time, but when the shit hits the fan and the stock market starts crashing it tends to move the other way. Again, I spelled it out up above.
 
Why not communicate clearly with black and white line drawing in the style of the one above.
A paint program comes standard on your computer. A no brainer to draw.
No. I spelled
yeah, we know. Now draw us a picture.

Why would you not show us what you want with black and white clarity Soy?
 
No. I spelled it out above what I am looking for. I would say a successful candidate would go up (gain money) over time, but when the shit hits the fan and the stock market starts crashing it tends to move the other way. Again, I spelled it out up above.
When the shit hits the fan and the stock market tanks, you're suppose to get out of the trade. Other than that, I suggest you look into hedging your bet with options.
 
I think OP point was to try to find something that can inverse the QQQ as a lead into what the QQQ might do in the near future. And in truth, there is nothing that leads it outside empirical data, which is lagging anyways. I mean as far as I am concerned, overall, in general, over a long time-frame, the ZN is best inverse. Hell, we all know gold has been pointless. Oil is pointless.

There is no true leading indicator of another instrument that can predict the QQQ's movement. Tech-heavy shit like that? It's just the Fed.

I may be wrong, but I think he's trying to reinvent pairs trading. :D
 
Back
Top