The simplest of technical analysis seems to work with a probability far greater than if it were random, especially on the longest of time frames. It may be self-fulfilling and that may be the extent of the "science" of it. But boy I have seen it work more times than I can count.Quote from ASusilovic:
Hi nitro. I am one of the old fashioned traders, still believing in supoort/ resistance levels and all this "antique" stuff the young boyz are not listening anymore to...Because nowadays there are "Algos" replacing human sense...If your assumption on SPX is right - target 1425 - this might correlate by coincidence with breakout of DOW JONES through 12.800 resistance back in late April 2007...If we go back to these levels - isn´t it funny how markets are working and testing former resistance levels...![]()
![]()
![]()
These levels that I talk about are all based on the technical analysis aspects of DOW theory. The rest is fundamental analysis based on intermarket relations, direct or indirect. Then I take those two inputs and through "artistic analysis" give commentary based on experience on what I think the markets are focusing on. In other words, even though I don't talk about psychology, it is embedded in the commentary because I focus on the fear and greed that I think the market participants have in their current conciousness.
Today, fear won out. That is was late in the day, we lost about 1.5% on SPX in the last 1/2 hour, bodes very badly for Monday. 1425 will be tested.
nitro