And there was LTCM and the beginning of the tech implosion under Clinton. He also started the push for increased home ownership at all costs...and we're sure paying for it now. Janet Reno (Nero?) was his trusty enforcer.
While not defending Bush at all, he was left with really poor economic conditions and the beginnings of the housing bubble. Your "analysis" conveniently leaves all this out.
While not defending Bush at all, he was left with really poor economic conditions and the beginnings of the housing bubble. Your "analysis" conveniently leaves all this out.
Quote from eminitrader007:
If Obama wins and the economy does well, the con-servatives will say it is because of Bush tax cuts and the $600 rebate. The markets and economy did very good under Clinton and they think it is because of Reagan. They seem to forget that there was a crash when Reagan was in office and there was another Republicon president after Reagan. The seed for the current trouble was planted by Reagan and how appropriate it came crashing during W's term.
