Stanford:
1. I have the blog, but did not yet post in it. I plan to share the URL, when I make some posts. It you would be good if readers here (particularly those who were not beginners a lot time ago) can share their views on some of the important questions/points/concepts/etc to answer/elucidate/explain/etc.
2. With regard to the sunken cost in the strategy in the email, you can pay it from your cash as described, but I believe that one can do better/safer by raising it from the market first, and then when you have it raised you may run the regular strategy if you so choose. A weakness I noticed in there is in money management, the risk of a blow up, and the underestimate of the cost of sunk insurance if acquired when volty is high.
Falconview:
1. If you look back in the other thread, I did an analysis of straddles in which I proved what one can expect to make most, without leverage in the straddles. Go read it again. It has some figure of 70%.
2. Leverage increases rewards, but also increases risk. I believe that you may be in dangerous grounds if your main interest in options is leverage/margins via shorting option premium. I would want to be very careful.
3. If you like the premium of a straddle, and the margin of a candor, then make equal the strike of the short strike of the candor put and candor call. The position will be a short straddle, with the long puts and calls acting as wings. Another name for this is butterfly. If you buy more puts and calls than you are short, then you have what people call "battman" (like the movie). The idea is that if market moves too fast, the wings allow you to fly.
4. Time spread: there is no margin requirements. The yield can be high on time spread. The issue: you have to wait for time to pass, and make sure the volty does not go down. So it is good for low volty environment that may go up. If you think that volty will go up, market will stay where it is or go down, and time passes (a sure thing), then you can try a put time spreads (below current price).
Please re-read my posts on time spreads and straddles (in other thread). Above points are repeats.
5. You have detected the issue that Michael may have had, which was that you "wrote" you made on the put side more than the credit which was a typo issue as you recent post indicate. I assume you have answered the core question you had.
6. I think you are using a description of options in your own words. It is a good. I am however not sure I understand all of what you mean in your posts, because of the terminology. This is not a critique, but simply a statement in case I mis-understand or do not answer some points that you have in mind.
I have received private messages from people as experienced as past fund managers, and people who doctoral degrees. They are entering the trading business (particularly options). Therefore never under-estimate the talent out there, at the same time it is reassuring that at least one may be looking in the right direction.
Regards to both of you!