Odds McCabe stepped down to bear witness in Mueller's investigation?

I hear it's an inspector general report.... May or may not have anything to do with this investigation.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/29/politics/chris-wray-mccabe-fbi/index.html

What investigation are you referring to that does not and has not involved the IG and is separate from the IG's investigation? The IG has been up to his eyeballs working with the Intel Committee and has fed them 3/4 of what they are running with. He is even on Mueller's arse. He is the one who outed Strzok to the Intel Committee.

The IG and his coming report is also one of the reasons why the tard argument here that this is all just Devin Nunes being Devin Nunes is not going to work. ie. the IG- who is independent- has been doing his own investigation since before the election and the FBI has to deal with the fact that their own internal watchdog- who also reports to Congress- is the main driver of many of the allegations of corruption and looking the other way in the FBI.

As I said a couple weeks ago, when Rosenstein lost that showdown with Congress and ended out having to release the dossier material and had to agree to let DOJ/FBI people testify, then things would begin to unravel fast. He was hoping to hide all this and keep it internal under the guise of an active investigation going on. He has played that game for years. And, as I have said before, the Obama/Hillary cartel threatening the IG in the past is coming back to bite them. He could not wait to see her gone and having to deal with Loretta and others trying to get him to look the other way all the time.
 
I think he was forced to step down after the FISA memo came to light.

FBI Director Wray "Shocked To His Core" By FISA Memo, McCabe 'Removed' Next Day, More Heads To Roll: Report

FBI Director Christopher Wray was allegedly "shocked to his core" after viewing the four-page FISA memo Sunday night - hours before asking Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe to step down, according to journalist Sara Carter.

WrayCrop.jpg


Hannity sat down once again with journalist Sara Carter, whose sources say McCabe may have instructed FBI agents to alter their "302" forms - the paperwork an agent files after interviewing someone:

Carter: What we know tonight is that FBI Director Christopher Wray went Sunday and reviewed the four-page FISA memo. The very next day, Andrew McCabe was asked to resign. Remember Sean, he was planning on resigning in March - that already came out in December. This time they asked him to go right away. You're not coming into the office. I've heard rep[orts he didn't even come in for the morning meeting - that he didn't show up.

Hannity: A source of mine told me tonight that when Wray read this, it shocked him to his core.

Sara Carter: Shocked him to his core, and not only that, the Inspector General's report - I have been told tonight by a number of sources, there's indicators right now that McCabe may have asked FBI agents to actually change their 302's - those are their interviews with witnesses. So basically every time an FBI agent interviews a witness, they have to go back and file a report.

Hannity: Changes? So that would be obstruction of justice?

Carter: Exactly. This is something the Inspector General is investigating. If this is true and not alleged, McCabe will be fired. I heard they are considering firing him within the next few days if this turns out to be true.

Carter said that McCabe "quitting" is just the beginning, and that more resignations will be coming.

As we reported yesterday, McCabe was "removed" from his post as deputy director, "leaving the bureau after months of conflict-of-interest complaints from Republicans including President Trump." Several media outlets reported that McCabe is using his remaining vacation days to go on "terminal leave" and that his official retirement from the agency won't happen until March, allowing him to collect the full pension.

And as we noted last week, FBI Director Wray threatened to resign after being pressured by AG Jeff Sessions.


Around the time of the reports of his impending retirement, McCabe had spent several marathon sessions answering questions from Congressional committees behind closed doors.

It was expected that McCabe would hang on until early March, when he would become eligible for his full pension. It's unclear why he's choosing to step down early.

McCabe's accelerated resignation may a sign that Trump appointee Christopher Wray - who succeeded James Comey as FBI Director - is finally cleaning house.

According to Axios, McCabe may be leaving in anticipation of the release of an inspector general's report on how the FBI handled the Clinton email investigation.

"Shocked to the core" because of inaccuracies and false narrative in the memo:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...-percent-after-he-s-asked-to-release-gop-memo

You really have to hand it to Fox for packaging its steaming pile of news for its target audience.
 
"Shocked to the core" because of inaccuracies and false narrative in the memo:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...-percent-after-he-s-asked-to-release-gop-memo

You really have to hand it to Fox for packaging its steaming pile of news for its target audience.
"On Monday, one day after he read the memo, Wray summoned FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe to his office for a meeting, the person familiar with the matter said. After the two talked, McCabe submitted his resignation..."

Nothing to see here folks...
 
I guess we'll see once the memo is released, which is only a matter of time now.
Not until the facts underlying the conclusions are presented. It already smells because of the Republican machinations, and I think you know it. But if the facts support the conclusions, then so be it.
 
Last edited:
Not until the facts underlying the conclusions are presented. It already smells because of the Republican machinations, and I think you know it. But if the facts support the conclusions, then so be it.

Are you suggesting Republicans altered or made up the stuff in the memo? Because I think there are bipartisan sources who were involved in the memo.
 
Are you suggesting Republicans altered or made up the stuff in the memo? Because I think there are bipartisan sources who were involved in the memo.
I am not aware of bipartisan participation in the 4-page memo. And I refer to alleged inaccuracies that do not align with underlying facts. When it ALL comes out, then we will see, and probably not just with the memo itself.
 
I am not aware of bipartisan participation in the 4-page memo. And I refer to alleged inaccuracies that do not align with underlying facts. When it ALL comes out, then we will see, and probably not just with the memo itself.
One of the worst words in the English language is bipartisanship. The other party needs to be defeated with extreme prejudice--not coddled, massaged or pleased. ---Very scary word and idea indeed--bipartisanship.
 
Back
Top