re the preceding posting from MKTrader--
those are the kind of stats i just love. Thanks for sharing that with us MK.
A word of caution though--calendar biases have to be handled with especial care. They hold real potential for abuse. Consider the luminaries that have their computers search through every possible holding pattern of the year--long on Jan second, exit on third, long on the second out on the fourth--all the way through the end of the year. then flip it all around to the short side. They inevitably have many 80-90 or 100 percent examples to offer just through the sheer volume of trials, and offer they do. They don't tell you that such deviations from the mean are normal though, and that they don't portend anything exciting for the future.
There are plausible fundamental reasons on why people bid the stock market up in late December, however, and as MK observes, year after year, it seems to play out according to Hoyle. I have been following it in real time for over a decade now.
those are the kind of stats i just love. Thanks for sharing that with us MK.
A word of caution though--calendar biases have to be handled with especial care. They hold real potential for abuse. Consider the luminaries that have their computers search through every possible holding pattern of the year--long on Jan second, exit on third, long on the second out on the fourth--all the way through the end of the year. then flip it all around to the short side. They inevitably have many 80-90 or 100 percent examples to offer just through the sheer volume of trials, and offer they do. They don't tell you that such deviations from the mean are normal though, and that they don't portend anything exciting for the future.
There are plausible fundamental reasons on why people bid the stock market up in late December, however, and as MK observes, year after year, it seems to play out according to Hoyle. I have been following it in real time for over a decade now.