Ocho and/or Tree ----- Quick legal Question

[UsualName]

Not sure what that even means.
It'll be litigated by the best lawyers money can buy, on both sides.

Anybody's guess on the jury, albeit a Blue State. And Twitter banned Trump.

BUT>>>> if they make Elon buy Twitter>>>> Trump gets back on.

If they didn't drink, they sure will start.

You say “not sure what you’re talking about” then proceed to talk like a drunk guy in his backyard.

All this talk about Trump and blue state stuff is nonsense. And, why would a merger agreement go to a jury trial? Come on.

Making Musk buy Twitter at $54 is most likely impossible because he probably doesn’t have access to the funding anymore and a lower price puts the board at risk to shareholders. There’s already lawsuits from shareholders that are meritorious.

When the judge, not a jury, peels back the onion it’s going to be Musk that stinks, is my guess and he will be on the hook for the $1 billion in the end.

At the end of the day I think my prediction that Musk will sink two companies with this Twitter fiasco will hold up well.

Heres a good thread to sober you all up:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1525481890643337216

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

Making Musk buy Twitter at $54 is most likely impossible because he probably doesn’t have access to the funding anymore and a lower price puts the board at risk to shareholders. There’s already lawsuits from shareholders that are meritorious.

Some truthiness contained therein, especially in regard to selling Tesla shares or using them as collateral on other financing.

But he already has 19 other investors in with him already. Some biggies too. Larry Elison, Sequoia Capital etc. Although it would dilute his position, I don't see why he could not just go bigger with his current investors or add more in if he wanted to make it happen. Not sure he does or has accepted that yet but I am saying if he does or is mandated to do so.

 

[UsualName]

Some truthiness contained therein, especially in regard to selling Tesla shares or using them as collateral on other financing.

But he already has 19 other investors in with him already. Some biggies too. Larry Elison, Sequoia Capital etc. Although it would dilute his position, I don't see why he could not just go bigger with his current investors or add more in if he wanted to make it happen. Not sure he does or has accepted that yet but I am saying if he does or is mandated to do so.

I was actually thinking Musk may end out trying to claim non compos mentis but you bring up the point about other investors and that kind of undermines that.

But the reason why I bring up the financing is because the Twitter deal is all financed through his personal holdings and there is a backstop that if Tesla falls below a certain level it will force a sale of the collateral stock to pay the loan. As this gets litigated through I would expect Tesla to take a pounding and the finances of the deal to turn to shit.

Also, I’d like to note Musk may be ultimately on the hook for $2 billion. There is some separate provision for another billion I can’t recall right now but it will probably turn up at a later date.

 

[Buy1Sell2]

Well, he's overdue then.

WAY overdue

 

[Tony Stark]

I understand you asking Tree, but Ocho Rios?? Seriously---

I understand him asking Ocho , but Tree?? Seriously---.Tree is wrong on damn near everything.

On this topic Musk will pay more than a billion for this fiasco

 

[Buy1Sell2]

I understand him asking Ocho , but Tree?? Seriously---.Tree is wrong on damn near everything.

On this topic Musk will pay more than a billion for this fiasco

You are also wrong more than 99 percent of the time. As for Musk, has it ever occurred to you that exposing Twitter may have been his plan all along?

 

[Tony Stark]

You are also wrong more than 99 percent of the time.

Source

 

[Tony Stark]

As for Musk, has it ever occurred to you that exposing Twitter may have been his plan all along?

He hasn't exposed Twitter though.All hes done is make an ass out of himself and cost himself a ton of money

 

[vanzandt]

I understand him asking Ocho , but Tree?? Seriously---.Tree is wrong on damn near everything.

On this topic Musk will pay more than a billion for this fiasco

I call em like I see em down here in politics, and at least imo, Tree's opinion/narrative/prognostication on many things is spot on. I don't agree with his, and pretty much everyone else down here, when it comes to this financial support, billions monthly, for the Ukraine into infinity, because that's what it's going to be until Putin dies, but other than that, Tree has a pretty good grip on things. His two posts above were quite informed. Ocho may lean a little left, but he's not an extremist and always worth the read, whether I agree or not.

.

(I quoted you so you'd see the question below... else it might get lost in the mud here)

Speaking of.... Ocho... you live in NYC right? How do you feel about this clerk that stabbed and killed that guy in self defense being charged with 2nd degree murder?

 

[Buy1Sell2]

He hasn't exposed Twitter though.All hes done is make an ass out of himself and cost himself a ton of money

Again you show yourself to be wrong.