" Even though the Democrats will likely win many seats in congress, the reality is that the Republicans have so soured the news media that it's almost impossible for voters to make informed decisions. (Your shredder misinformation is a good example of how misinformation poisons debate.) Thus the direction of the country, over decades, can't help but go downwards."
Do you really think the average red stater really wants to be informed and make informed decisions?
Do you really think the average red stater really wants to be informed and make informed decisions?
Quote from bigdavediode:
Now now, be fair. That was during the Iran/Iraq war and Iran shared some of the blame for that (I know, I know, Iran is above reproach when it's necessary for a Republican argument.)
Plus that's when the Republicans were giving him money, guns, WMDs and support.
Remember the picture of Rumsfeld shaking Saddam's hand?
No. That story was debunked already, along with most of the other nonsense.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saddam_Hussein's_alleged_shredder
I'm sure you did. Secondhand information is no basis for a war.
No, not quite correct. Although I do feel that the Republicans must have phenomenal compartmentalization to not recognize the blood on their hands.
Perhaps you want to repharse "landslide" to "marginal loss." You can see pretty much any poll here:
http://www.pollingreport.com/wh08gen.htm
If you're referring to the country, I kind of agree. Even though the Democrats will likely win many seats in congress, the reality is that the Republicans have so soured the news media that it's almost impossible for voters to make informed decisions. (Your shredder misinformation is a good example of how misinformation poisons debate.) Thus the direction of the country, over decades, can't help but go downwards.