Obamacare to save Hawaii which went thru earthquake??

[bugscoe]

Quote from hermit:

You had no question, whenever you get proven wrong which is quite often, you keep deflecting to silly talking points straight from equally dumb bloggers.

You've made a point of saying that Obama specifically meant the 2006 earthquake. But no where did Obama say that. You're just assuming and substituting your assumption as fact.

So please explain how we know Obama wasn't referring to the 1975 quake?

If it's so obvious, then quite stalling and answer the question.

 

[hermit]

Quote from bugscoe:

You've made a point of saying that Obama specifically meant the 2006 earthquake. But no where did Obama say that. You're just assuming and substituting your assumption as fact.

So please explain how we know Obama wasn't referring to the 1975 quake?

If it's so obvious, then quite stalling and answer the question.

Because a 'major disaster' happened in 2006, why would he be referring to 1975? How will the provision relate to something in the 70s? What kind of silly arguments are you trying to make here?

 

[bugscoe]

Quote from hermit:

Because a 'major disaster' happened in 2006, why would he be referring to 1975? How will the provision relate to something in the 70s? What kind of silly arguments are you trying to make here?

That you have no idea what he actually meant and neither does he.

 

[hermit]

Quote from bugscoe:

That you have no idea what he actually meant and neither does he.

Its hard to take opinion from someone who didn't even remember what actually happened until he was reminded of it.

 

[Index piker]

Poor insecure hermit has me on ignore so he does not have to face relevant questions like:

What the hell does a mild earthquake have to do with nationalizing health care?

 

[bugscoe]

Quote from Index piker:

Poor insecure hermit has me on ignore so he does not have to face relevant questions like:

What the hell does a mild earthquake have to do with nationalizing health care?

 

[bugscoe]

Quote from hermit:

Its hard to take opinion from someone who didn't even remember what actually happened until he was reminded of it.

Since your logic dictates that things Obama doesn't specifically say are clearly obvious and should be considered fact, then since Obama in fact DID say a 3000% reduction in premiums, it will be noted as fact and no mistake.

 

[Ricter]

I knew this would get steered into questioning the severity of the earthquake(s). Hate will find a way.

 

[hermit]

Quote from bugscoe:

Since your logic dictates that things Obama doesn't specifically say are clearly obvious and should be considered fact, then since Obama in fact DID say a 3000% reduction in premiums, it will be noted as fact and no mistake.

Why will he be referring to a 70's earthquake when a earthquake happened in 2006 and what exactly will the provision achieve for an event that happened 35 years ago?

And why don't you correct the article you quoted which completely missed the 2006 earthquake bit and its whole premise is based on getting the facts wrong?

 

[hermit]

Quote from Ricter:

I knew this would get steered into questioning the severity of the earthquake(s). Hate will find a way.

Its the usual trickery - post something false, twist words, deflect questions till everyone forgets what the topic was about but never admit a mistake even if you are caught redhanded.