I'm serious! Compare the aftermath of the bank failures following the 1929 crash with the aftermath of the recent great recession to see how much better recapitalizing the banks worked then just letting them go under. No comparison! What we did this time around produced a much better result. Not painless, but far better than last time around.This is a sarcastic post, right? It has to be.
In all likelihood though, we could have done much better still, . I agree with Soros that instead of taking the bad assets off the banks books we should have left them there and helped the banks replenish their equity instead. That would have been putting the money where the hole was. And of course we should have extracted more concessions regarding bonuses, and executive compensation for bailing out the banks.
