Obamacare Failed Americans

OBAMACAREFAIL.jpg

http://www.thefederalistpapers.org/...eason-health-premiums-have-risen-dramatically

If you have health insurance in the United States and you actually pay for it yourself or through an employer, you know first-hand the huge increases in costs since Obamacare was implemented.

That tale about $2,500 you were supposed to save according to Obama and Democrats was always a lie, but that didn’t matter as long as they got it shoved through.

Now that Obamacare has been implemented for several years, studies have been conducted to truly look at the results of whether or not healthcare premiums and overall costs were increased. Almost all studies prove what you already know: healthcare premiums and costs increased, and not just by a small percentage.

One study, probably conducted by Democrats who are pro-Obamacare, claims that premiums were actually lower. Forbes essentially rips them apart with actual results:

The new Brookings study does not mention the numerous studies, including the rigorous 2014 Brookings study, that come to opposite conclusions, does not use actual pre-ACA individual market data, does not consider the huge increase in the cost of medical claims in the individual market after 2013, and makes a number of questionable methodological choices. The authors arrive at a different conclusion than most scholars who have examined the effect of the ACA on health insurance premiums. Most scholars and analysts conclude that, particularly when fully accounting for the various government subsidies for individual insurance coverage, the ACA significantly increased individual market premiums.

You can see the rise in the individual healthcare costs from the chart below. Be sure to thank your local Democrat for that, and then remember to vote them out of office in November.

healthpremiumchart.jpg


Obamacare has basically become nothing but medical welfare. While Americans are paying higher healthcare costs, they are also paying for more people to get ‘free’ healthcare. Meanwhile many aren’t getting the care they need because they simply can’t afford the out-of-pocket costs and/or the deductibles.

Obamacare is supposed to be Obama’s ‘legacy.’ It’s a legacy all right, a giant failure of a legacy that continues to destroy the healthcare system and hurt Americans.
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cary-a-presant-md/how-good-is-obamacare-now_b_9637228.html

Obamacare, the Affordable Care Act (ACA), has dramatically affected almost every American’s healthcare decisions and healthcare costs. Benefits provided by the act and its regulations have changed relationships between doctors and patients.

How good has this act been for people and the healthcare system? I began giving the ACA grades on 4-24-2014 here in the Huffington Post. I updated the grades on 8-21-2014. Now it is time (after 2 Supreme Court decisions and a maturing insurance market) for the next semester grades.

Why do I call these semester grades? Well, I am a university graduate and also a university professor, so grades are a part of my experience, just as they have been to most Americans. And as author of the navigational guide book about using the American healthcare system Surviving American Medicine, I am able to evaluate the experiences of people with the ACA in light of my 4 decades of academic and clinical practice, as discussed in my website as well. Also, semester implies that these are interim evaluations, and we all know there continues to be talk of expansion, improvement, modification, and even repeal of Obamacare in this electoral season. So we have more regulations, laws, and insurance modifications along with more physician changes that will continue to affect our attitudes towards the ACA and American healthcare. But let’s look at how well the ACA and all of us are doing with the healthcare system right now.

In April 2014, I gave Obamacare a grade point average (GPA) a 2.0 (letter grade is C). By August 2014 the average had improved a little to 2.2 (C+). Has this changed now? Here is my evaluation split up into the ABCs and PQRs.

ACCESS: Since the ACA is predominately an insurance reform statute, Obamacare has resulted in increased numbers of insured Americans. In 2008, 14.6% of Americans over 18 were uninsured. This has decreased to 11.4% (the CDC estimates this rate may now be as low as 9.6%). Over 20 million people have health insurance today who were previously uninsured, but it still leaves 30.7 million people without insurance. Estimates by Rand Corp. show that of NET newly insured people, 9.6 million were insured under an employer plan, 6.5 million by Medicaid expansion in the states, 4.1 million through the ACA marketplace individual plans (mostly with subsidies), and 1.5 million by individual non-marketplace private health plans. Notably, there are 25% more plans available in the marketplace in 2015 versus 2014. My grade: A minus, more people insured.

BENEFITS: the ACA has brought changes to most health plans unless the employer has an exempted plan. New benefits not previously covered include elimination of pre-existing conditions; payments for prevention and screening; access to dental and vision care for children; expanded rehabilitation, mental health and prenatal care; and coverage for patients participating in clinical trials. My grade: B, since many expensive drugs and treatments are still difficult to get approved.

CONFIDENCE: Gallup polls have shown that overall public confidence in health care increased from 31% in 2008 up to 41% in 2012. This enthusiasm at the beginning of the ACA implementation has been continued since the 2015 confidence was 43%, but it has not increased further. In my practice I see patients continuing to be worried about how rates will change, how physician panels will change, and how coverage for their expensive medicines may decrease. My grade is C for this aspect, since 57% of people still lack confidence in the polls and my practice.

PRICE: Costs associated with ACA have exceeded estimates. With the mandated increased benefits in all plans, private healthcare plans have seen premium increases of 13-38%. Patients over 65 covered by Medicare have increasingly opted for Medicare Advantage with a rise in enrollment of 8% per year. The ACA is gradually closing the donut hole and reducing patient charges for prescription medications. Overall, American healthcare costs increases have slowed considerably, although it is not certain if this reduced inflation of costs is due to better physician performance, stricter insurance authorization, or changes within the ACA itself. Unfortunately, most individuals insured through employers or private plans or in the marketplace have experienced much higher deductibles, higher premiums, and more prevalent preauthorization review with cost management. This has made these people feel under-insured, despite the fact they have an insurance policy. Some businesses have reduced the available hours for employees in order to avoid ACA mandated health insurance requirements. My grade: C, Obamacare is expensive unless you get the generous subsidies in the marketplace.

QUALITY: 1 in 14 patients are receiving care through physicians and hospitals participating in alternative payment models (like the 700 accountable care organizations, ACOs), which must report quality metrics on all their patients. This has improved compliance with some quality measures. In hospitals, there has been a 17% reduction in patient harms (e.g., in hospital infections or blood clots). Re-admission rates (after patients have been discharged) have decreased with ACA mandated use of transition care through care coordinators and/or nurses. My grade: B minus, many expensive interventions are delayed or unavailable to some patients.

RECORDS: Physicians are increasingly embracing use of electronic medical records (EMRs). This allows administrators in insurance organizations, healthplans and government to evaluate how well we are delivering care, and in time may allow us to individualize care more precisely (Big Data projects). Overall, 56% of doctors are using EMRs. Some patients value using patient portals to get results, schedule appointments, get disease and treatment information, and exchange messages with their doctors. But most patients don’t care about these EMR benefits, and physicians dislike the mandates for reporting “meaningful use” compliance in order to maintain regular Medicare payments or network participation. My grade: C, too much busy work, too expensive and not enough doctor use yet.

So the overall grade for the first semester of 2016 is 2.53 or a B minus, the highest grade yet for Obamacare. But it is not perfect, as seen in the above discussions. There are many improvements that can be made through regulation, legislation, revision or replacement. But some progress has been seen for some people, albeit not for everyone.

My tips to patients:

• Always have health insurance.
• Discuss available plans with your employer’s Human Resources department, union, a Medicare adviser at the social security office, a private health insurance agent, or state Medicaid office. See my book Surviving American Medicine for a discussion of various types of health insurance plans.
• Once you have insurance, be sure to discuss with your doctor all the prevention and screening that you need to stay healthy.
• If you have a chronic condition, discuss care coordinators with your doctor, who may have a care coordinator and/or nurse available at the office or through the hospital or health plan.
• Use websites such as NIH, CDC, or Surviving American Medicine to get sophisticated information to discuss with your healthcare team.
 
Obama care achieved one worthwhile result, which was mandating coverage for pre-existing conditions. Unfortunately, the only feasible way to achieve this is apparently to force everyone to have health insurance. The problem is exacerbated by the irrational linkage of insurance to employment, resulting in a loss of coverage if you change jobs or lose your job.

The rest of Obamacare is mainly a typical democrat freebie scheme to its voting base of parasites, paid for by inefficient and opaque subsidies from mainly republican constituencies.

The whole thing reminds me a bit of Homeland Security. We addressed a problem of national security bureaucracies not working together efficiently by creating another vast national security bureaucracy, staffed by unionized drones.
 
If you have any familiarity with healthcare provisions throughout the world you will know that Obama care or something like it was inevitable. It, or something like it had to come.

Is Obamacare the best we could have done?? That will be open to endless debate.

When Obamacare was first passed Nancy Pelosi admitted that it was too complex to know exactly what was in it... or exactly what it's effects would be.

One can quote rising costs etc. but it's really comparing apples and oranges. Before Obamacare many costs were hidden and born by the medical community simply because when a patient presents himself for care he MUST be cared for. Turning him away is out of the question. Yet there was (and is) no firm facility to pay for that care.

At one point in my life I worked at a ghetto hospital. (Temple hospital in Philadelphia) and on Friday and Saturday nights I would go up to the emergency room about 2:00 AM with an ambu bag in my hands and airways etc. in my pockets. I and the house staff would wait for the onslaught of stabbings, shootings, cracked heads and other trauma that we knew would be coming in. Our emergency room had two OR's at the back and they would be full of dying patients and house staff trying to keep them alive.

None of those patients had health insurance. Temple Hospital bore the burden of caring for those people because it would have been unconscionable to just let them accumulate on our doorstep and die.

If you have never had such an experience you should just shut up about Obamacare.

You know nothing.

:)
 
Last edited:
There are many ways to pay for the costs of thug violence. A direct subsidy to care givers is preferable to the convoluted cross subsidies of obamacare.

I live in an urban area with the same situation and I can tell you that people make a conscious effort to avoid hospitals that are flooded with ghetto casualties. So the hospital gets a double whammy of unreimbursed costs and loss of paying customers. The rational response for local governments would be to stamp out the violence, but that is unthinkable for the liberals who run these cities. Some race hustlers might be offended, so everyone suffers.
 
...I and the house staff would wait for the onslaught of stabbings, shootings, cracked heads and other trauma that we knew would be coming in. Our emergency room had two OR's at the back and they would be full of dying patients and house staff trying to keep them alive.
None of those patients had health insurance. Temple Hospital bore the burden of caring for those people because it would have been unconscionable to just let them accumulate on our doorstep and die.

Temple didn't "bare the burden", they simply spread the costs among those that paid. How many of those gang bangers do you think have Obamacare today?
 
Temple didn't "bare the burden", they simply spread the costs among those that paid

You have said nothing. Temple "bore the burden" by spreading the cost among paying patients (in those days patients with BC/BS), with charitable donations AND with contributions from the City of Philadelphia (i.e. taxpayers). Did you think Temple had a license to print money??

The breaking point, which eventually spawned Obamacare was when BC/BS, in an attempt to reduce its costs, began paying fixed rates for care given instead of paying the cost of the facility. That left a gap which the nation has been struggling to fill ever since. Obamacare is the latest effort to fill that gap in an organized way.
 
The rational response for local governments would be to stamp out the violence

Would you like to be appointed to "stamp out the violence" ??

I'll vote for you. Bring your assault rifle and we're home free.

(you'll be interested to know that when I was standing in front of the ER at Temple my brother was a Philadelphia Policeman. Homicide detective. We occasionally met for breakfast in the Temple cafeteria. He eventually left Philadelphia (having put in his time in hell) for the state police in rural Pennsylvania where he has a little horse farm)

BTW I don't call them 'gang bangers' I call them people. I don't like them. I hate them. I still call them people.
 
Last edited:
If you have any familiarity with healthcare provisions throughout the world you will know that Obama care or something like it was inevitable. It, or something like it had to come.

Is Obamacare the best we could have done?? That will be open to endless debate.

When Obamacare was first passed Nancy Pelosi admitted that it was too complex to know exactly what was in it... or exactly what it's effects would be.

One can quote rising costs etc. but it's really comparing apples and oranges. Before Obamacare many costs were hidden and born by the medical community simply because when a patient presents himself for care he MUST be cared for. Turning him away in out of the question. Yet there was (and is) no firm facility to pay for that care.

At one point in my life I worked at a ghetto hospital. (Temple hospital in Philadelphia) and on Friday and Saturday nights I would go up to the emergency room about 2:00 AM with an ambu bag in my hands and airways etc. in my pockets. I and the house staff would wait for the onslaught of stabbings, shootings, cracked heads and other trauma that we knew would be coming in. Our emergency room had two OR's at the back and they would be full of dying patients and house staff trying to keep them alive.

None of those patients had health insurance. Temple Hospital bore the burden of caring for those people because it would have been unconscionable to just let them accumulate on our doorstep and die.

If you have never had such an experience you should just shut up about Obamacare.

You know nothing.

:)

First let me state that I believe the problem with Obamacare is that it did not go far enough. If a public healthcare is viewed as something that government should be providing for society (people will debate this) then the U.S. government should have implemented a full public plan. Obamacare for the most part was a giveaway to the medical industry driven by lobbyists. Many other countries have very successful public plans that could be used as a good example for a starting point of a public plan for the U.S. - if full public healthcare coverage is a desired policy.

In terms of hospitals, we now have multiple hospitals in North Carolina in poor rural areas and poor urban areas struggling to stay open. Many have closed. The one thing all these institutions have in common is that they blame ACA for their demise. Effectively the changes put in place by Obamacare basically make it so they cannot get proper reimbursement for the care they provide effectively for free to the community. This is an even more prevalent problem in areas with large numbers of illegals. So basically these hospitals land up bankrupt and closed in the end leaving gaps in the community's healthcare.

Of course, ACA is not only factor in the closing of hospitals but it is a high on the list of several factors.

http://www.newsobserver.com/news/local/article43625457.html

http://www.beckershospitalreview.co...ntly-shuttered-hospital-chance-to-reopen.html

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/7-hospital-bankruptcies-so-far-in-2016-july27.html
 
that is exactly correct.

If you are going to fix healthcare... the way the left really wanted it...

let the govt provide for base care through a vouchers for catastrophic care plus some preventive care. let the rest of us supplement it for better plans if we wish.


Obamacare was just insurance company care with massively increased premiums and fewer choices.


First let me state that I believe the problem with Obamacare is that it did not go far enough. If a public healthcare is viewed as something that government should be providing for society (people will debate this) then the U.S. government should have implemented a full public plan. Obamacare for the most part was a giveaway to the medical industry driven by lobbyists. Many other countries have very successful public plans that could be used as a good example for a starting point of a public plan for the U.S. - if full public healthcare coverage is a desired policy.

In terms of hospitals, we now have multiple hospitals in North Carolina in poor rural areas and poor urban areas struggling to stay open. Many have closed. The one thing all these institutions have in common is that they blame ACA for their demise. Effectively the changes put in place by Obamacare basically make it so they cannot get proper reimbursement for the care they provide effectively for free to the community. This is an even more prevalent problem in areas with large numbers of illegals. So basically these hospitals land up bankrupt and closed in the end leaving gaps in the community's healthcare.

Of course, ACA is not only factor in the closing of hospitals but it is a high on the list of several factors.

http://www.newsobserver.com/news/local/article43625457.html

http://www.beckershospitalreview.co...ntly-shuttered-hospital-chance-to-reopen.html

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/7-hospital-bankruptcies-so-far-in-2016-july27.html
 
Back
Top