Obama won't last 2 years...
- Thread starter Moc Yeah
- Start date
You mean this TV audience?:
"President Obama's town hall meeting on health care delivered a sickly rating Wednesday evening.
The one-hour ABC News special "Primetime: Questions for the President: Prescription for America" (4.7 million viewers, 1.1 preliminary adults 18-49 rating) had the fewest viewers in the 10 p.m. hour (against NBC's "The Philanthropist" debut and a repeat of "CSI: NY" on CBS). The special tied some 8 p.m. comedy repeats as the lowest-rated program on a major broadcast network."
Not surprising,most people already have their minds made up on the issue.I didn't need to watch the show,I already know that I support Obamas plan over doing nothing for 8 years like the Republicans did
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/21/health/policy/21poll.html?_r=4&partner=rss&emc=rss
June 21, 2009
In Poll, Wide Support for Government-Run Health
Oh yeah, the NY Times:
"Shocker: NYT Rigged Health Care Poll
Of course we are by now used to our one party media heavily over-sampling Democrats to prove to us how popular their agenda is.
But this latest New York Times poll would even make the Mullahs in Iran blush.
For buried in the details, rather than trumpeted in their slick graphics, is this breakdown:"
So, in their wisdom, The Times saw fit to solicit the views of Obama voters over McCain voters by a margin of 48 to 25 percent.
Lest we forget, in the last election Mr. Obama got 53% of the vote to Mr. McCainâs 46%.
But what the heck. The Times had to find a way to advance their mission.
After all, who reads their editorials unless they put them in the news section?"
Carry on.
Quote from bugscoe:
Oh yeah, the NY Times:
"Shocker: NYT Rigged Health Care Poll
Of course we are by now used to our one party media heavily over-sampling Democrats to prove to us how popular their agenda is.
But this latest New York Times poll would even make the Mullahs in Iran blush.
For buried in the details, rather than trumpeted in their slick graphics, is this breakdown:"
So, in their wisdom, The Times saw fit to solicit the views of Obama voters over McCain voters by a margin of 48 to 25 percent.
Lest we forget, in the last election Mr. Obama got 53% of the vote to Mr. McCainâs 46%.
But what the heck. The Times had to find a way to advance their mission.
After all, who reads their editorials unless they put them in the news section?"
Carry on.
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/living/US/healthcare031020_poll.html
Where is all the support for the Republicans health care plan ? (which they don't have and didn't have for the past 8 years )
Why should they have a plan?
Do I give a fuck if you or Pedro are insured? No more than you should give a shit about my personal business.
Too funny that asshole leftists think "health care is broken" when I spend about half as much on Blue Cross Blue Shield-who has unlimited risk on my health costs-as I do in property taxes to send Third World illegals to public schools.
How come the left doesn't say education is broken? Oh! Maybe because every seedy, on the public dole "educator", public administrator and union flunkie votes Democrat.
I'll bet you this: If the AMA was as much up the Democrat's ass as the NEA or AFL-CIO you'd never hear the phrase "health care reform" again.....
Do I give a fuck if you or Pedro are insured? No more than you should give a shit about my personal business.
Too funny that asshole leftists think "health care is broken" when I spend about half as much on Blue Cross Blue Shield-who has unlimited risk on my health costs-as I do in property taxes to send Third World illegals to public schools.
How come the left doesn't say education is broken? Oh! Maybe because every seedy, on the public dole "educator", public administrator and union flunkie votes Democrat.
I'll bet you this: If the AMA was as much up the Democrat's ass as the NEA or AFL-CIO you'd never hear the phrase "health care reform" again.....