I have a question.. .
Is there a chance they redacted the memo but did not admit to it?
All of sudden Nunes started talking about future memo's like he had more content.
Nunes has seen much, much more than he can talk about.
He has seen the original sources that his committee/nunes report was based on.
He has also seen the unredacted copy of the dossier very the astronomically redacted copy that is floating around from Grassley/Graham. So he knows all the sources in that memo that are referred to as "Clinton associates" and "state department employees."
In addition- and this is big but we don't have detail yet- the committee has been working for months on further investigation of the state department and their tag team relationship with the fbi in this unmasking/dossier/cover for Hillary routine- and I guess I don't need to say on a day like today- all of that happened with Obama's (I will be generous here) cooperation. Including his role in assuring that it would be leaked by lowering the security classification on it a a final dump on the way out so that the media would learn that trump people were under investigation.
That nunes/committee report on the State Department chapter is coming out Friday - or the process of releasing it will surface anyway- so that will be another front that opens up. However, as with the fbi piece, Nunes sees the background investigation and sources on the state department investigation too- which gives him more information than what is in the report when it comes. Probably- as with the fbi piece- selected dems will see that background info too that supports the report or is the basis of it.
So there is a lot going on and when Nunes talks about something, there are things that he has seen and will be made available to the public, and there are things that he has seen that is more than what the public has seen but has pieces that are redacted for even for him, and there are pieces where they are still fighting to have the redaction lifted.
If I had to take a guess, when you heard him refer to "future memos" he was referring to the state department related memo coming out on Friday. Altogether, there are three memos planned. One is on the fbi and is out. The next one is the state department one. Coming soon. After that, and a bit further down the road, he plans to release another memo that ties the first two together and does and analysis of the collusion between all the parties and agencies, white house included. My understanding anyway.
It's hard to keep up with but it is great to see some movement.