Obama to unilaterally disarm the United States

[Lucrum]

Quote from Brass:

And please take me off your "buddy list."

No can do Kimosabe

I'm not interested. No means no.

Huh? I haven't asked for anything. You dreaming again?

 

[piezoe]

Maybe it's time for a new forum: "The insanity Forum."

 

[futurecurrents]

+1 to Maxi. I take back anything I may have said about him. It's getting so hard to pigeon-hole people these days. Now I'm confused..I need a nap.

 

[Brass]

Quote from futurecurrents:

+1 to Maxi. I take back anything I may have said about him. It's getting so hard to pigeon-hole people these days. Now I'm confused..I need a nap.

That's a lot of stock you're putting into one comment that states the obvious. Let's see what happens when you two discuss economics and he starts trickling down.

 

[Trader666]

What comment that "states the obvious"? We have a second Canadian on the board who "thinks" he knows how many nuclear weapons we need?

Quote from Brass:

That's a lot of stock you're putting into one comment that states the obvious.

 

[Brass]

Quote from Trader666:

What comment that "states the obvious"? We have a second Canadian on the board who "thinks" he knows how many nuclear weapons we need?

No, you're the only expert here who's ready to educate the Pentagon on what's what.

 

[Trader666]

The Pentagon's not recommending we reduce our nuclear weapons to 300, idiot. Why don't you stick to things you know about that concern your own country for a change?

Quote from Brass:

No, you're the only expert here who's ready to educate the Pentagon on what's what.

 

[Brass]

Quote from Trader666:

The Pentagon's not recommending we reduce our nuclear weapons to 300, idiot.

As I understand it, neither did Obama. The question is about reduction, and a number of levels are being considered by all concerned, including the Pentagon. You're the only one who has the right numeric answer to everything because you're clinically insane. You really are.

 

[wjk]

I don't have an issue with a reduced amount of warheads in our arsenal providing we don't underfund missile defense and associated research.

A successful missile defense system would act as a deterrent from a hostile country that would foolishly believe just having more nukes creates a winnable first strike option. It would be best to have a workable shield in place prior to unilateral disarmament.

 

[Trader666]

You don't understand it. And from your ignorant comments, you didn't even read the article at the OP (or understand it if you did). Nor do you get the context.

Quote from Brass:

As I understand it, neither did Obama. The question is about reduction, and a number of levels are being considered by all concerned, including the Pentagon.

Show me where I claimed to have "the right numerical answer" to this, Gayfly. My point went completely over your head. And you're in no position to call anyone insane, Thunderpussy-->Gayfly-->brASS, given that your life is so pathetic as a Canadian you spend your time stalking us and our politics here, spewing nonsense like accusations of treason without even knowing what it meant. Fuck off loser.

Quote from Brass:

You're the only one who has the right numeric answer to everything because you're clinically insane. You really are.