Quote from Mom0/pH0x:
you think israel is the only one who would benefit from a iranian nutcases not acquiring nukes? you think that ONLY behooves israel? you are kidding right? please say that you aren't suggesting that iran is only a threat to israel if they acquire nukes...
A non nuclear Iran is a threat to Israel via their support of Hezbollah.
A paper tiger.
Anyone who thinks that a glorified freakin' militia compares to China as a future military threat has holes in their head.
Besides just because someone is a threat to Israel doesn't mean they're a threat to the U.S. Perhaps Israel should apply for statehood.
Many wingnut, moonbat Americans will vote for one of these AIPAC Dem's thinking they're choosing "peace" over Bush's policy in Iraq.
Much the same way LBJ exploited the pacifist vote when he beat Goldwater.
A post-Musharraf nuclear Pakistan worries most people more than Iran.
I'm a Christian who believes Jews are "chosen." So does Bush. In a secular America it isn't right for leaders to impart policy (war) decisions based upon our personal beliefs.
During JFK's 1960 campaign he was pressured to dispel rumors that as a Catholic he'd be a tool of the Vatican.
In the future it may be that American's demand our President not be a tool of Israel.
Defending Israel from an attack is just.
Preemptively attacking supposed threats on behalf of Israel is insane.
We're friends with Taiwan. Should we attack China because they verbally threaten Taiwan?