Obama thinks he is the 4th best president ever, In other News Rome continues to burn

[Veyron 16.4]

Quote from Lucrum:

Hence one of many reasons I'm adamantly opposed to four more years of Odumbo.
He has NO intention of reducing ANY spending.

I guess the concept of driving down the 1/6 GDP national expenditure by creating a lower cost system overall (after full implementation), is a foreign idea to you.

If you don't get your national health care costs under control, you won't have much more of a "spending problem" - because there won't be much to spend anymore. That is the second point of the national health care initiative. First, to cover. Second, to lower costs.

The original concept was never rocket science, so it should not be that difficult to understand that increased competition, drives down costs for everybody involved and continues to drive down costs over the long-term, as fewer emergent care incidents due to not having coverage, or adequate coverage, is reduced dramatically.

If you actually studied the matter, instead of swallowing everything you hear on Rushbo Radio, and see on Fake News, then you'd actually have a grip on the subject matter we are attempting to discuss here.

But, since is it painfully obvious that you don't have an ounce worth of understanding about the Economics of Health Care in America, I'm going to use your post as my Poster Child snapshot for exactly why most extreme Right Wing hyper-partisan hacks, just don't get it.

I don't visit ET very much anymore, but it has been a blast, yet again.

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to All!

 

[pspr]

Quote from Veyron 16.4:

I don't visit ET very much anymore, but it has been a blast, yet again.

Next time try to stick to subjects you know something about.

 

[AK Forty Seven]

Quote from pspr:

Next time try to stick to subjects you know something about.

Says the idiot that claimed Obama spends 100 days a year on vacation when Obama hasn't spent 100 days on vacation his entire presidency.Fucking moron

 

[Spike Trader]

Quote from Veyron 16.4:

I guess the concept of driving down the 1/6 GDP national expenditure by creating a lower cost system overall (after full implementation), is a foreign idea to you.

If you don't get your national health care costs under control, you won't have much more of a "spending problem" - because there won't be much to spend anymore. That is the second point of the national health care initiative. First, to cover. Second, to lower costs.

The original concept was never rocket science, so it should not be that difficult to understand that increased competition, drives down costs for everybody involved and continues to drive down costs over the long-term, as fewer emergent care incidents due to not having coverage, or adequate coverage, is reduced dramatically.

If you actually studied the matter, instead of swallowing everything you hear on Rushbo Radio, and see on Fake News, then you'd actually have a grip on the subject matter we are attempting to discuss here.

But, since is it painfully obvious that you don't have an ounce worth of understanding about the Economics of Health Care in America, I'm going to use your post as my Poster Child snapshot for exactly why most extreme Right Wing hyper-partisan hacks, just don't get it.

I don't visit ET very much anymore, but it has been a blast, yet again.

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to All!

. . Spoken like a true Patriot ...... nothing but the plain truth.I wish there was some way to inject those words into the heads of some of the Poster Children we have here. .

Another milestone for Obama...... the last of the troops on Iraq will be with their families for Christmas.... welcome home guys and don't let the Poster Children . . send you to another useless war.

 

[Max E.]

What a complete and utter load of shit, you actually think that Obamacare is going to bring down costs!?! You think we are going to insure people with pre existing conditions and insure another 50 million people and costs are actually going to go down?? LOL, I suposed you are one of the ones who also thinks that Obamacare is not going to add to the deficit right??? If thats the case i have some magic beans i want to sell you.

You can argue all kinds of things like the morality of it and how we have to cover these people who cant afford it, or people with pre-existing conditions but arguing that Obamacare is gong to bring down healthcare costs is plain idiotic.

What has happened to healthcare costs since Dems started pushing the bill?? You really are drinking the dildocratcs koolaid.

Quote from Veyron 16.4:

I guess the concept of driving down the 1/6 GDP national expenditure by creating a lower cost system overall (after full implementation), is a foreign idea to you.

If you don't get your national health care costs under control, you won't have much more of a "spending problem" - because there won't be much to spend anymore. That is the second point of the national health care initiative. First, to cover. Second, to lower costs.

 

[Max E.]

So your also a 9/11 troofer who thinks Bush was involved in 9/11 hey?

That tells me all i need to know about you, and it says that you are impervious to factual information, so there is no point in continuing the debate.

Quote from Veyron 16.4:

Second, it is my belief (as well as that of many intelligent people), mostly from having high-performance multi-engine jet aircraft flight experience, that 911 was not carried out according to the 911 Commission Report and that Neoconservative operatives were somehow involved in the plot against United States soil.

Now, if you want to look at the evidence for that declaration, I am more than happy to have that discussion with you, but it will have to be inside another thread, as such a discussion if off-topic here. It would also be a very technical discussion involving aerodynamics, flight performance factors, flight performance envelopes, flight physics, crash site signatures, crash sight geometries, NTSB investigative protocols, DNA typing and amplification protocols and processes, national airspace defense protocols, NORAD, FAA flight restriction protocols, Part 121 IFR flight procedures regarding departing flights on domestic soil and a host of other technical issues.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Veyron 16.4:

I guess the concept of driving down the 1/6 GDP national expenditure by creating a lower cost system overall (after full implementation), is a foreign idea to you.

Obamacare is NOT a lower cost system. In fact I can't think of a single government program or agency that is a lower cost system.

I guess cold harsh reality is a foreign concept to you.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Veyron 16.4:

... increased competition, drives down costs for everybody involved and continues to drive down costs over the long-term, as fewer emergent care incidents due to not having coverage, or adequate coverage, is reduced dramatically...

Here is an example of how Odumbo care is going to drive down costs.
Only it's not through increased competition.
Maybe if you knew something about Odumbo care you wouldn't be arrogantly touting it as something it's not.


<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/0wsnHGI5K-E" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

 

[Max E.]

Just like everything else with socialists they operate from behind the scenes in shady ways, this picture pretty sums up the democratic party.

Quote from Lucrum:

Here is an example of how Odumbo care is going to drive down costs.
Only it's not through increased competition.
Maybe if you knew something about Odumbo care you wouldn't be arrogantly touting it as something it's not.

 

[cgroupman]

Quote from Lucrum:

Here is an example of how Odumbo care is going to drive down costs.
Only it's not through increased competition.
Maybe if you knew something about Odumbo care you wouldn't be arrogantly touting it as something it's not.


<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/0wsnHGI5K-E" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Again, disregarded since the source is just a name calling kid. And, who obviously has himself spoon fed without any type of rational discussions.



c