Obama Sticks Another Knife Into The Back of Israel

Quote from AK Forty Seven:

Maybe Obama isn't sticking knives in Israels back if they are giving him their highest honor and 70 % of Jews voted for him to be re-elected.
Neither of which means anything. Now go ahead and repeat your meaningless point again...and again...
 
Quote from pspr:

Obama is a real son of a bitch.
----

TEL AVIV, Israel — Israel’s military fumed Monday over the discovery that the U.S. government had revealed details of a top-secret Israeli military installation in published bid requests.

The Obama administration had promised to build Israel a state-of-the-art facility to house a new ballistic-missile defense system, the Arrow 3. As with all Defense Department projects, detailed specifications were made public so that contractors could bid on the $25 million project. The specifications included more than 1,000 pages of details on the facility, ranging from the heating and cooling systems to the thickness of the walls.

"If an enemy of Israel wanted to launch an attack against a facility, this would give him an easy how-to guide. This type of information is closely guarded and its release can jeopardize the entire facility," said an Israeli military official who commented on the publication of the proposal but declined to be named because he wasn’t authorized to discuss the facility. He declined to say whether plans for the facility have been altered as a result of the disclosure.

"This is more than worrying, it is shocking," he said.

Pentagon spokesman Lt. Col. Wesley Miller said he couldn’t comment on the specifics of the Arrow 3 base, but he said the United States routinely published the details of its construction plans on a federal business opportunities website so that contractors could estimate the costs of jobs. He said such postings often might be revised after contracts were approved.

Israeli officials appear to have been well aware of the danger of outsourcing building projects to the United States. In an interview with the Reuters news agency in March, Lt. Col. Peleg Zeevi, the head of the bidding process at Israel’s Defense Ministry, justified Israel’s long history of relying on the United States to help build military installations by saying that Israel needed "a player that has the knowledge, ability and experience."

"We are aware of the security issues that arise in deals with foreign firms, but because we want real competition and expertise, we will create conditions that will allow and encourage their participation," Zeevi said.

It appears, however, that Israeli officials were caught by surprise that details of the facility at Tel Shahar, classified so top secret that Israel’s military won’t officially confirm its location between Jerusalem and Ashdod, would be made so public.


Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/06/...ls-of-missile.html#.Ua0-qUAa6lg#storylink=cpy


so all those on this board who call themselves traders believe what they read in the news print?
 
Quote from AK Forty Seven:


<a href="http://photobucket.com/images/head%20up%20ass" target="_blank"><img src="http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r272/cdylan007/head_up_ass.jpg" border="0" alt="head up ass photo: Uncomfortable head_up_ass.jpg"/></a>
 
Quote from Lucrum:

<a href="http://photobucket.com/images/head%20up%20ass" target="_blank"><img src="http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r272/cdylan007/head_up_ass.jpg" border="0" alt="head up ass photo: Uncomfortable head_up_ass.jpg"/></a>

If former Senator Robert Byrd can say it, so will I. Ak is a "white nigger."
 
its hard to fathom ak trumpeting 69% of the jewish vote for Obama when in 2008 he got 78% of the vote which is typically about what the democrats get.
 
Quote from jem:

its hard to fathom ak trumpeting 69% of the jewish vote for Obama when in 2008 he got 78% of the vote which is typically about what the democrats get.

Considering the current economic environment he should have lost more support then that.I remember Maverick and other righties kept mentioning that only 1 President in the last 100 has won re election with with + 7.5 %unemployment (FDR) .Obama only losing 1 out of 10 Jewish voters and becoming only 1 of 2 Presidents in the last 110 years to be re elected with unemployment this high is very good imo
 
Quote from AK Forty Seven:

Considering the current economic environment he should have lost more support then that.I remember Maverick and other righties kept mentioning that only <font color=red>1 President in the last 100</font> has won re election with with + 7.5 %unemployment (FDR) .Obama only losing 1 out of 10 Jewish voters and becoming only 1 of 2 Presidents in the last 110 years to be re elected with unemployment this high is very good imo

How many presidents have there been, professor? :D
 
Quote from pspr:

How many presidents have there been, professor? :D

You righties made the argument not me



http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showt...=220752&perpage=6&highlight=bump&pagenumber=2


Quote from Maverick74:

RCG, I'm going to give you a pass for now and assume you are not a student of political history because if you were, you would know that no incumbent has ever won re-election with unemployment over 8% give or take a few ticks. It's very simple, that number is going to determine the election. If it gets back down to the 7's, Obama should win no matter who the right puts up there. If it's over 8%, there is not a snowball's chance in hell Obama wins. I'm a trader RCG, I go with the numbers.

BTW, Romney has no chance in the primary. The list you gave is very off. I take it you don't watch a lot of news shows. So I'll do you a favor, the top two guys right now are Huntsman and Daniels. You mentioned neither. That's OK. I'm a nice guy, I'll give you another pass. Just write that down. We'll revisit this thread 6 months from now.





Quote from Maverick74:

Since World War II, no president or incumbent party has won re-election in a presidential race when the unemployment rate was higher than 7.5 percent. The current rate officially is 9 percent, and if those who have given up looking for a job are included, it is actually around 10 percent; almost no expert thinks it will drop sharply in the next year and a half.






Quote from Maverick74:

True. Let me put it another way. The last three Presidents (GHB, Carter and Ford) who had unemployment over 7.5% not only lost, but got absolutely killed in their re-elections. It matters.
 
Back
Top