Obama speaks at GOP retreat and does a Q&A, but FOX only shows snippets?

By JOHN FUND

President Obama made a smart move on Friday by going into the lion's den. He became the first President not just to attend a Congressional retreat of the opposition party but also to take members' questions live on television. Republicans, who have long criticized Mr. Obama for not having C-SPAN cameras airing policy discussions, could hardly refuse the White House's demand that C-SPAN be allowed into such a session for the first time.

During the 80-minute discussion, Mr. Obama demonstrated how a president can dominate a public event. The House Republicans who lined up to question him at their retreat in Baltimore had to speak up to him from below a podium, allowing him to seem to address them from on high. Mr. Obama batted back or slid away from most of the questions thrown at him as he pressed his message that the American people don't want more gridlock and partisanship.

But while Mr. Obama won the photo-op aspects of the meeting and the tactical victory of the day, Republicans wrung some soundbites out of him they can use in the future. Mr. Obama was forced to accept and hold up for the cameras a 30-page Republican booklet entitled "BETTER SOLUTIONS: a Compilation of GOP Alternatives." He acknowledged that he had read their bills on health care and complimented Rep. Paul Ryan, ranking Republican on the budget committee, for having a realistic solution to the growth of Medicare. All of that will make it harder for Mr. Obama and his surrogates to paint the GOP as "the party of 'No'" in the future.

In addition, Mr. Obama conceded that the health care bill that emerged from Congress would not fulfill his pledge that Americans who want to keep their existing health insurance unchanged would be able to do so. He also indicated that as president he would like to get bills from Congress that were less complex and less lengthy than many recent monstrosities that could only be subject to an up-or-down presidential veto or signature. GOP members of Congress, who have long supported a new line-item veto power for the president that would pass Constitutional muster, will no doubt now press him to lend support to their efforts.

But the real winners from the exchange were the American people, who got to see a spontaneous version of the "Question Time" that British members of Parliament have long used to demand accountability from their Prime Ministers. Here's hoping that Friday's session won't be the last
 
Quote from CaptainObvious:

I thought the president did a better than average job, all things considered. I give him kudo's for showing up, politically motivated or not. The Repubs made some good points as well. We'll see if anything comes of it other than the usual pot shots.
Fair enough. :)
 
Quote from Lucrum:

but FOX only shows snippets?
So you watch Fox?
Did you not read the part about my hearing of FOX's "oversight" on The Daily Show? Two plus two?
 
Quote from WaveStrider:

I saw the whole thing (eventually) and Obama's going to have his hands full dealing with...Pelosi!

That guy who worked with him in Illinois gave him a real lowdown on Pelosi stiff-arming any Republican input. Obama knew what he was being told was true because he knew the guy from before and had worked with him (and looked like he believed what he was saying - you could see it on his face.)

Obama handled himself well in the meeting, but he is going to have to deal with the BS pumped out from BOTH sides, not just the GOP's.
Again, fair enough. :)
 
Quote from Mercor:

By JOHN FUND

President Obama made a smart move on Friday by going into the lion's den. He became the first President not just to attend a Congressional retreat of the opposition party but also to take members' questions live on television. Republicans, who have long criticized Mr. Obama for not having C-SPAN cameras airing policy discussions, could hardly refuse the White House's demand that C-SPAN be allowed into such a session for the first time.

During the 80-minute discussion, Mr. Obama demonstrated how a president can dominate a public event. The House Republicans who lined up to question him at their retreat in Baltimore had to speak up to him from below a podium, allowing him to seem to address them from on high. Mr. Obama batted back or slid away from most of the questions thrown at him as he pressed his message that the American people don't want more gridlock and partisanship.

But while Mr. Obama won the photo-op aspects of the meeting and the tactical victory of the day, Republicans wrung some soundbites out of him they can use in the future. Mr. Obama was forced to accept and hold up for the cameras a 30-page Republican booklet entitled "BETTER SOLUTIONS: a Compilation of GOP Alternatives." He acknowledged that he had read their bills on health care and complimented Rep. Paul Ryan, ranking Republican on the budget committee, for having a realistic solution to the growth of Medicare. All of that will make it harder for Mr. Obama and his surrogates to paint the GOP as "the party of 'No'" in the future.

In addition, Mr. Obama conceded that the health care bill that emerged from Congress would not fulfill his pledge that Americans who want to keep their existing health insurance unchanged would be able to do so. He also indicated that as president he would like to get bills from Congress that were less complex and less lengthy than many recent monstrosities that could only be subject to an up-or-down presidential veto or signature. GOP members of Congress, who have long supported a new line-item veto power for the president that would pass Constitutional muster, will no doubt now press him to lend support to their efforts.

But the real winners from the exchange were the American people, who got to see a spontaneous version of the "Question Time" that British members of Parliament have long used to demand accountability from their Prime Ministers. Here's hoping that Friday's session won't be the last
1. Should the invited guest speaker have been seated in the audience?

2. Perhaps Mr. Fund had his TV on mute when that passage transpired, because his commentary is only sketchily accurate. I would imagine that someone would share such commentary with others only if he hadn't seen, and listened to, the actual passage himself.
 
dosent matter how suave he is and how good he is in answering qns, the economy is still being ruined and investors simply do not like this guy
 
Back
Top