Obama shaking down airlines now.

[Max E.]

Quote from Ricter:

Actually, in your sector it's the internet that's decreasing demand.

Not sure i understand what you mean by this.

 

[bugscoe]

Quote from Ricter:

They already lost their jobs--they were union workers. But the good news is that the airlines will probably be laying off more unionized workers. You must be pleased.

How are the poor suppose to travel with even higher costs now?

It's sure nice to hear rich guys like you still can.

 

[Ricter]

Quote from bugscoe:

How are the poor suppose to travel with even higher costs now?

It's sure nice to hear rich guys like you still can.

The poor... haven't you heard? There are jobs! Search for the thread. Maybe you'll see one of your own replies in there admonishing them to get off their asses and get to work.

 

[bugscoe]

Quote from Ricter:

The poor... haven't you heard? There are jobs! Search for the thread. Maybe you'll see one of your own replies in there admonishing them to get off their asses and get to work.

So we we need a jobs bill despite there being plenty of jobs for the poor?

I want to hear how you explain to the poor that paying more for traveling is no big deal.

It's 'your' ideology who claims to be the great protector of the poor.

 

[Ricter]

Quote from bugscoe:



It's 'your' ideology who claims to be the great protector of the poor.

Curiously, now you're the leftist.

 

[bugscoe]

Quote from Ricter:

Curiously, now you're the leftist.

Curiously, I'm not the one who said this: 'So $15 altogether. I can handle it.'

 

[Ricter]

Quote from bugscoe:

Curiously, I'm not the one who said this: 'So $15 altogether. I can handle it.'

I think the important thing here is that whether there are deserving poor, or the poor have character defects (ie. it's their fault they're poor), and whether or not a jobs bill would or would not be effective based on that, and whether or not $15 is an excessive increase (it's not excessive if the poor are undeserving), that despite all those variables and perspectives the important thing to espouse is that Obama is to blame.

 

[Max E.]

Quote from Ricter:

I think the important thing here is that whether there are deserving poor, or the poor have character defects (ie. it's their fault they're poor), and whether or not a jobs bill would or would not be effective based on that, and whether or not $15 is an excessive increase (it's not excessive if the poor are undeserving), that despite all those variables and perspectives the important thing to espouse is that Obama is to blame.

The post you deleted was funnier.

 

[Ricter]

Quote from Max E. Pad:

The post you deleted was funnier.

I must be losing it, what did I delete? Or did I edit my reply?

 

[Max E.]

Quote from Ricter:

I must be losing it, what did I delete? Or did I edit my reply?

edit: nevermind it was on another thread.... i got confused, it was the post about christie playing world of war craft.