Which only goes to show that the country can survive Odumbo but NOT an electorate stupid enough to elect him twice.
Obama orders coal power-plant pollution cuts
- Thread starter gwb-trading
- Start date
Perhaps people are watching that Cosmos series which shows similar findings:
From NASA, global warming:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/gaJJtS_WDmI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/-IuVzcp39rs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
From NASA, global warming:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/gaJJtS_WDmI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/-IuVzcp39rs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
People were asked if they would support the rules if their utilty bills rose $20 a month. I wonder what they would say if they were asked what if they triple? of course, most obama voters don't pay any utility bills, so WTF do they care.
I wonder what the results would be if they were asked do you support rules that will do nothing for the environment but will raise your utility bills and create more unemployment?
I wonder what the results would be if they were asked do you support rules that will do nothing for the environment but will raise your utility bills and create more unemployment?
Today's Outrageous Claim
Obama: Power plant rule will shrink power prices
http://www.wral.com/epa-seeks-to-cut-power-plant-carbon-by-30-percent/13692926/
Yeah right!
If you like your doctor, you can keep him.
Which reminds me of all millennials will have to live with in the wake of the buffoon in the WH they were so eager to elect.Today's announcement reminds me of this:
Planned coal-power closings won't cut CO2 much
http://www.usatoday.com/story/money...rements-barely-cut-carbon-emissions/10008553/
The electric power industry's plan to retire more than 10% of its coal-fired generators within a decade will do almost nothing to reduce the nation's emissions of heat-trapping carbon dioxide, a USA TODAY analysis finds.
The 140 slated retirements â mostly small, old generating units in the Midwest and South â account for only 4% of all CO2 emitted last year by U.S. power plants. In fact, not one ranks among the top 100 units for carbon emissions and only 12 are among the 475 units that comprise the top 10% of emitters, according to a review of 2013 federal data.
(More at above url)
http://www.usatoday.com/story/money...rements-barely-cut-carbon-emissions/10008553/
The electric power industry's plan to retire more than 10% of its coal-fired generators within a decade will do almost nothing to reduce the nation's emissions of heat-trapping carbon dioxide, a USA TODAY analysis finds.
The 140 slated retirements â mostly small, old generating units in the Midwest and South â account for only 4% of all CO2 emitted last year by U.S. power plants. In fact, not one ranks among the top 100 units for carbon emissions and only 12 are among the 475 units that comprise the top 10% of emitters, according to a review of 2013 federal data.
(More at above url)