Yup. Most people feel the same way.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Obama is going to bomb Syria.
- Thread starter Grandluxe
- Start date
Yup. Most people feel the same way.
Quote from CaptainObvious:
And that's a bad thing? Let's just nuke the entire region and be done with it. We all know that's how this ends, so let's get on with it.
Is this the end game, Capn?
Are your desires to be consumed in a fiery blast of nuclear annihilation?
Wouldn't you consider at least for a short time postponing such a catastrophe to yourself and loved ones?
I for one, would rather see the Capn's return from the dark side. Who's with me?
The time may be closer at hand than we know.
The best decisions need to be made.
Come on back home, Captain- The men here, we need you more than you may realize for your heartfelt leadership, Your sound morals, and keen wisdom.
And try to bring that shit eating Lucrum back with you too, Would ya?
Bush got vote of congress, how is obama allowed to attack syria without congressional aspproval under the war powers act?
here is the war powers act, so you can read it one more time, then tell me how he is able to send armed forces abroad when the us is not under attack, without congressional approval.
this provides that the President can send U.S. armed forces into action abroad only by authorization of Congress or in case of "a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces."
Which one of the united states territories, possession, or armed forces are currently under attack by syria?
here is the war powers act, so you can read it one more time, then tell me how he is able to send armed forces abroad when the us is not under attack, without congressional approval.
this provides that the President can send U.S. armed forces into action abroad only by authorization of Congress or in case of "a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces."
Which one of the united states territories, possession, or armed forces are currently under attack by syria?
No, Max. This isn't war.
This is "kinetic military action". Big difference....
This is "kinetic military action". Big difference....
Quote from Max E. Pad:
Bush got vote of congress, how is obama allowed to attack syria without congressional aspproval under the war powers act?
here is the war powers act, so you can read it one more time, then tell me how he is able to send armed forces abroad when the us is not under attack, without congressional approval.
this provides that the President can send U.S. armed forces into action abroad only by authorization of Congress or in case of "a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces."
Which one of the united states territories, possession, or armed forces are currently under attack by syria?
War Powers Act is:
Over
ruled.
The constitution allows the president to use any and all force necessary if he concludes their to be an imminent threat to the US.
You may at some point just have to concede that it's over your head and out of your control (which is really the best thing for us all).
Quote from Hoofhearted:
War Powers Act is:
Over
ruled.
The constitution allows the president to use any and all force necessary if he concludes their to be an imminent threat to the US.
You may at some point just have to concede that it's over your head and out of your control (which is really the best thing for us all).
You really are both a moron and a shill hoofhearted, i already told you i think that republicans and bush and democrats are all a bunch of war mongering morons, for you to sit up here and defend obamas ability to attack syria without congressional approval by claiming they are an "imminent threat" is absolutely assinine.
Please explain exactly how syria could logically pose any threat to the u.s. in the next six months.......
Quote from Max E. Pad:
correct me if im wrong, im way to many beers deep right now, but this was sarcasm right?
Affirmative. That's what a national security adviser to Obama called Libya. No congressional authorization necessary. The term stuck.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ry-action-says-National-security-adviser.html