So if almost no one watches them they can hardly be blamed for election results.We've gone through this before. We have a leftist media. It's just that almost no one watches them.
So if almost no one watches them they can hardly be blamed for election results.We've gone through this before. We have a leftist media. It's just that almost no one watches them.
We've gone through this before. We have a leftist media. It's just that almost no one watches them.
Logically you must mean just enough hoi polloi, which would tend to indicate that a large number of people do indeed watch the "lamestream media", or alternatively, large numbers of those watching Fox vote in "the wrong direction"--perhaps because they just watched Fox.Well, the hoi polloi listen to them just enough to be brainwashed.
FOXNews stopped being a news source during Bush's first term.
I remember watching ABC, NBC, CBS, and CNN illegally and incorrectly call the elections results for Florida in 2000 for Al Gore. The only one who didn't make that call was Fox News. Of course, we know what happened when the votes were counted.
Why would anyone trust those news sources again?
Still stuck on stupid...So if almost no one watches them they can hardly be blamed for election results.
Well, the hoi polloi listen to them just enough to be brainwashed.
Perhaps this will help you discover it:Is your post supposed to have a point?