Obama Invites Immigrants to Avoid Oath of Allegiance, Pledge to Defend America

There are many things wrong with my country, America. But too many immigrants is not one of them. America draws its strength from its immigrant population. Thank God for immigrants.
You, the president, and most of the left just can't bring yourselves to distinguish between legal and illegal. That's the core of the problem.
A country with no borders isn't a country. A melting pot is what a united people look like. A nation like ourselves with such diversity absolutely need to be united as one country, loyal to one country, pledge allegiance to one country, honor and respect one country. To do otherwise is to be divided. It's multiculturalism without assimilation. That has been, is, and will continue to be a complete failure. It's not even debatable.
 
original.gif
 
The A Word. This is about Allegiance.

We don't cut off our nose to spite our face. Two wrongs don't make a right. Americans have a right to defend themselves and their country. Should we let in millions of fake Syrian refugee terrorists because we bombed Iraq and killed a whack of people last decade? Two wrongs don't make a right. We make it right and keep our people safe at home.

Either immigrants are Americans first, or they get an ass kick out the door. Obama may not have any allegiance to America, but we do.

Obama's policies on immigration are to accomplish one goal.... DESTROY AMERICA!! (1) Islamify us. (2) Dilute* our Caucasian race and culture with hispanics and muslims. (3) Overwhelm our social support system financially, Cloward & Piven style, causing it to break down... leading to civil unrest... and likely leading to marshal law and worse.

*Whites comprise only about 8% of the world's population. Fortunately for us, we've been the most financially successful and enjoyed the most personal liberties.... mostly because our style of government as been more-or-less Democratic while the rest of the world has suffered through socialism and dictatorships. The rest of the world hates our success. And as they are unwilling or unable to change to be more like us and to enjoy our success for themselves, they jealously must destroy us. In 20-30 years or so, there will be no Caucasian "race". Sadly, we are helping them to destroy us. (By "we", I don't mean real Americans, of course.)

Obama has been a wolf in sheep's clothing since day one. When Obama sat in Rev. Wright's church for 20 years and heard him proclaim, "not God Bless America, GOD DAMN AMERICA!", Obama took it to heart.

:(
 
Last edited:
I watched the actual video. I'm sure you did not. Trump is barely audible in the video. I think the reporters question was barely audible to him. He gave a yea, sure whatever response. There's nothing here.

Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump appeared to soften his tone on immigration Saturday, saying he wouldn't issue mass deportations if he became president.

"President Obama has mass deported vast numbers of people — the most ever, and it's never reported. I think people are going to find that I have not only the best policies, but I will have the biggest heart of anybody," Trump said in an interview with Bloomberg Politics Saturday.

Pressed on whether he would issue mass deportations, as he has called for in the past, Trump said, "No, I would not call it mass deportations."
 
Links? When did Trump reverse on anything? Do you have any actual proof?

Donald Trump's 6 biggest policy flip flops
The New York tycoon has reversed his position on some of his most prominent proposals

Feliks Garcia New York
Monday 9 May 2016

"Having bested his other opponents in the Republican primaries, Donald Trump is inching closer and closer to becoming the official nominee as the July convention approaches - and has shifted his focus to the election.

"Mr Trump has moved toward attacking his next likely candidate, Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton, and other prominent Democrats in his path, such as Massachusetts Sen Elizabeth Warren.

"But as he has moved to appeal to a wider electorate outside of the primaries, Mr Trump has taken on some criticism for his many reversals on critical policy positions.

"Whether speaking on raising the federal minimum wage, increasing taxes for the wealthy, or abortion, the only thing the New York real estate mogul has proven is that he will not budge on only one matter: his willingness to say anything to maintain his controversial campaign’s upward trajectory.

"And on six critical issues, Mr Trump has pivoted between positions, muddling his exact stance on these certain issues.

Minimum Wage
"Mr Trump told NBC’s Meet the Press on Sunday that while he wishes to do away with the federal minimum wage, employers should pay workers more on a state-by-state basis.

“I have seen what's going on. And I don't know how people make it on $7.25 (£5) an hour,” he said.

“Now, with that being said, I would like to see an increase of some magnitude. But I'd rather leave it to the states. Let the states decide.”

"However, during a November Fox Business debate, the presumptive Republican nominee felt differently about how much US workers earned, making it clear that he did not sympathise with workers who are fighting for a $15 (£10.42) minimum wage.

“I can’t be [sympathetic] … and the reason I can’t be is because we are a country that is being beaten on every front,” he said. “Taxes too high, wages too high, we’re not going to be able to compete against the world. … I would not raise the minimum.”

Taxing the wealthy
"In the same Meet the Press appearance, Mr Trump went against a major core policy that has been a fixture of conservative politics for decades, and said he would likely increase taxes on the wealthiest Americans.

“The thing I’m going to do is make sure the middle-class get good tax breaks, because they have been absolutely shunned,” he said. “For the wealthy, I think frankly it’s going to go up - and you know what, I think it should go up.”

"In a tax plan released by the Trump campaign last year, all Americans would receive tax breaks, but the wealthiest would still benefit significantly.

"In an analysis by the Tax Policy Centre, the top one per cent of earners would receive a tax cut of more than $275,000 (17.5 per cent after-tax income). Individuals in the top 0.1 per cent of earners would receive a cut of at least $1.3m (19 per cent of after-tax income).

"Middle-income households would receive a cut of about $2,700 (five per cent of after-tax income) in the plan. The lowest-income households, however, would not benefit quite as much from Mr Trump’s proposed tax plan as those with the highest incomes, with a cut of about $128 (one percent of after-tax income).

Campaign finance
"Mr Trump has touted his $10bn worth in his campaign, highlighting the point that by self-funding he cannot be bought out by lobbyists.

“By self-funding my campaign,” he wrote in a September post on Facebook. “I am not controlled by my donors, special interests or lobbyists. I am only working for the people of the US!”

"But in a 4 May interview, he told the Wall Street Journal he was reversing that position as well.

“I’ll be putting up money, but won’t be completely self-funding, as I did during the primaries,” he said.

Abortion
"Mr Trump’s position on abortion came under scrutiny in March when he told MSNBC’s Chris Matthews that he supported a ban on the procedure, and women who undergo it should face punishment.

"If abortion is banned in the US, “you’ll go back to a position like they had where people will perhaps go to illegal places. But you have to ban it,” Mr Trump said, adding, “There has to be some form of punishment.”

"He quickly walked back the comments - which the Clinton campaign called “horrific and telling” - in a statement released by the campaign.

“This issue is unclear and should be put back into the states for determination. Like Ronald Reagan, I am pro-life with exceptions, which I have outlined numerous times,” he said.

"But Mr Trump had been previously supportive of women’s right to choose.

"In 1999, he told the Associated Press: “I believe it is a personal decision that should be left to the women and their doctors.”

"And in his 2000 book, The America We Deserve, he wrote, “I support a woman’s right to choose, but I am uncomfortable with the procedures.”

Health Care
"Mr Trump is opposed to a single-payer healthcare system and believes the industry should remain privatised.

“[Single payer] works in Canada. It works incredibly well in Scotland. It could have worked in a different age,” he said in the first GOP debate last year. “What I'd like to see is a private system without the artificial lines around every state.”

"However, he said the opposite in a 1999 interview with CNN’s Larry King.

“If you can’t take care of your sick in the country, forget it, it’s all over. ... I believe in universal healthcare,” he said.

"He expanded on the idea in his 2000 book.

Immigration
"The most prominent facet of Mr Trump’s campaign has been his stance on immigration. He announced his candidacy in June 2015 by referring to Mexicans as “criminals” and “rapists,” and promised he would build a massive wall on the US’ southern border.

"But when it comes to skilled immigrant labour, Mr Trump does not give quite as clear cut an idea of his position. According to the Washington Post, Mr Trump switched his stance on H-1B visas, which the US grants to skilled foreign workers at the request of business firms who need their expertise.

"During a CNBC debate in October, Mr Trump said he supported skilled foreign workers, and that they should stay in the country.

“We’re losing some of the most talented people,” he said. “They go to Harvard. They go to Yale. They go to Princeton. They come from another country, and they’re immediately sent out. I am all in favour of keeping these talented people here so they can go to work in Silicon Valley.”

"Following the debate, his campaign released a statement with a contrary position on the visa program.

“The H-1B program is neither high-skilled nor immigration: these are temporary foreign workers, imported from abroad, for the explicit purpose of substituting for American workers at lower pay,” Mr Trump said in the statement.

“I will end forever the use of the H-1B as a cheap labour program, and institute an absolute requirement to hire American workers first for every visa and immigration program. No exceptions.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...trump-flip-flop-policy-campaign-a7020831.html
 
Check this out:

Selective Service system registration requirements:

Current federal law, 5 U.S. Code § 3328 , passed on November 8, 1985, requires all males in the U.S. between the ages of 18 and 25 born after December 31, 1959 to register with the Selective Service System ( SSS ). As Zullo told The Sonoran News, the Selective Service System states of the penalties for failing to register:Failing to register or comply with the Military Selective Service Act is a felony punishable by a fine of up to $250,000 or a prison term of up to five years, or a combination of both. Also, a person who knowingly counsels, aids, or abets another to fail to comply with the Act is subject to the same penalties. If a man fails to register, or provides Selective Service with evidence that he is exempt from the registration requirement, after receiving Selective Service reminder and/or compliance mailings, his name is referred to the Department of Justice for possible investigation and prosecution for his failure to register as required by the Act. For clarification, if a man is exempt from registering with the Selective Service System, his name is not forwarded to the Department of Justice. The federal law stipulates that names are to be submitted to the Department of Justice annually. The more immediate penalty is if a man fails to register before turning 26 years old, even if he is not tried or prosecuted, he may find that some doors are permanently closed.

(comment) the above is the requirement to register and the penalty for not doing so


non-citizens requirement to register:

The SSS website further explains :NON-CITIZENS Some non-citizens are required to register. Others are not. Non-citizens who are not required to register with Selective Service include men who are in the U.S. on a valid student or visitor visa, and men who are part of a diplomatic or trade mission and their families. Almost all other male non-citizens are required to register, including undocumented immigrants, legal permanent residents, those seeking asylum, and refugees.

(comment) so it looks to me like these illegals that have been coming in are required by law to register or be subject to all kinds of sanction which were listed above. no?


The DOJ should be enforcing the law that is involved here. But no. Obama and co aren't doing that. Letting them go scot free.


This is different from the original point of this thread, which pertains to Obama letting newly naturalized citizens off the hook of the oath of allegiance and thereby also letting them get away without having to defend the country if there is a draft.

Obama is pretty much destroying the country by sabotage in multiple ways. Clinton will too.
 
Under the Obama administration’s expansive interpretation of executive authority, legal immigrants seeking citizenship through the nation’s Naturalization process are now exempt from a key part of the Oath of Allegiance.

Immigrants seeking to become citizens no longer have to pledge to “bear arms on behalf of the United States.” They can opt out of that part of the Oath. Nor do they have to cite any specific religious belief that forbids them to perform military service.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...-avoid-oath-allegiance-pledge-defend-america/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Legal immigrants" "Legal" They choose to not bear arms. Why do you object to that freedom of to choose?
 
Back
Top